chore: jest v29.7.0 -> 30.0.0

[nicknovitski]

Why

It's faster, at least locally where we run without coverage instrumentation.

Test Plan

CI.

[nicknovitski]

• fix: Fix entity exports for ESM projects #298
• chore: Unify repo-wide scripts #297
• chore: Use tsconfig bases #296
• chore: jest v29.7.0 -> 30.0.0 #295 👈 (View in Graphite)
• chore: Replace ts-jest with babel-jest #294
• chore: Remove @jest/types #293
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.78%. Comparing base (1fd0144) to head (fd5597c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #295   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.78%   99.78%           
=======================================
  Files          77       77           
  Lines        1879     1879           
  Branches      251      251           
=======================================
  Hits         1875     1875           
  Misses          4        4           

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	99.78% <ø> (ø)
unittest	99.78% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[wschurman]

nit: add a test plan (ditto)

[nicknovitski]

Merge activity

• Jun 20, 7:07 PM UTC: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.
• Jun 20, 7:15 PM UTC: Graphite rebased this pull request as part of a merge.
• Jun 20, 7:19 PM UTC: @nicknovitski merged this pull request with Graphite.