-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
test: Potential fix for 1 code quality finding in tests/zip_crypto.rs #607
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <223894421+github-code-quality[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Hennick <4961925+Pr0methean@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary of ChangesHello @Pr0methean, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a code quality suggestion identified by an AI tool. It focuses on improving the readability and descriptive accuracy of a constant name within a test file, making the test's intent clearer without altering its functional behavior. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary
This PR improves code clarity by renaming a constant from MIN_PARTIAL_READ_BUFFER_SIZE to PARTIAL_READ_TRIGGER_BUFFER_SIZE, making the name more descriptive of its actual purpose in the test.
Key Points:
- ✅ Code change is functionally correct and improves readability
- ✅ Test behavior remains identical
⚠️ PR title should follow Conventional Commits format (e.g.,refactor: rename buffer size constant for clarity)
The change is ready for merge once the PR title is updated to follow the project's Conventional Commits guidelines.
You can now have the agent implement changes and create commits directly on your pull request's source branch. Simply comment with /q followed by your request in natural language to ask the agent to make changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request refactors a constant name in tests/zip_crypto.rs to be more descriptive, based on a code quality suggestion. While the new name improves clarity on the constant's purpose, I've left one comment regarding a minor inconsistency it introduces with an existing code comment. Overall, the change is a small improvement to the test code's readability.
This PR applies 1/2 suggestions from code quality AI findings. 1 suggestion was skipped to avoid creating conflicts.