Skip to content

Conversation

@bburda
Copy link
Collaborator

@bburda bburda commented Feb 1, 2026

Pull Request

Summary

Fix invalid Discord links


Type

  • Bug fix
  • New feature or tests
  • Breaking change
  • Documentation only

Testing

How was this tested / how should reviewers verify it?


Checklist

  • Breaking changes are clearly described (and announced in docs / changelog if needed)
  • Tests were added or updated if needed
  • Docs were updated if behavior or public API changed

@bburda bburda requested a review from mfaferek93 February 1, 2026 20:17
@bburda bburda self-assigned this Feb 1, 2026
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 1, 2026 20:17
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This pull request updates Discord invite links across all documentation files from the old link (discord.gg/fEbWKTah) to a new link (discord.gg/6CXPMApAyq). This is a straightforward documentation maintenance change to ensure users can properly access the community Discord server.

Changes:

  • Updated all Discord invite links to the new URL discord.gg/6CXPMApAyq

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
README.md Updated 3 Discord links: badge link, community section, and footer
docs/index.rst Updated Discord link in community section
docs/introduction.rst Updated Discord link in community section
docs/roadmap.rst Updated Discord link in future directions section
docs/troubleshooting.rst Updated 2 Discord links in FAQ and getting help sections

@mfaferek93 mfaferek93 merged commit f3313a1 into main Feb 1, 2026
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants