Skip to content

Conversation

@rm-gh-8
Copy link
Contributor

@rm-gh-8 rm-gh-8 commented Dec 8, 2025

Backporting JDK-8368182: AOT cache creation fails with class defined by JNI.

This commit fixed the AOT cache to exclude JNI-defined classes by setting their shared_classpath_index to -1 instead of 0, preventing incorrect inclusion in the AOT configuration file. Also updated LambdaFormInvokers::regenerate_holder_classes() to specify a non-null code source, ensuring regenerated holder classes remain included in the cache.

Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed), jtreg tier1 tests (passed) and related tests (passed) on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:

(Passed) - make test-tier1
(Passed) - make test TEST=test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/appcds/aotCache

Results are attached.

linux-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log
linux-aarch64-specific-test.log
linux-x64-jtreg-tier1.log
linux-x64-specific-test.log
macos-aarch64-jtreg-tier1.log
macos-aarch64-specific-test.log
windows-x64-jtreg-tier1.log
windows-x64-specific-test.log


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • JDK-8368182 needs maintainer approval
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8368182: AOT cache creation fails with class defined by JNI (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/71/head:pull/71
$ git checkout pull/71

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/71
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/71/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 71

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 71

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/71.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 8, 2025

👋 Welcome back rm-gh-8! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 8, 2025

@rm-gh-8 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8368182: AOT cache creation fails with class defined by JNI

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 62 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 8f87fdce0b17f3edd453054461895330b82e8a71 8368182: AOT cache creation fails with class defined by JNI Dec 8, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 8, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required labels Dec 8, 2025
@rm-gh-8 rm-gh-8 marked this pull request as ready for review December 8, 2025 22:37
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 8, 2025

⚠️ @rm-gh-8 This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 8, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Webrevs

@rm-gh-8
Copy link
Contributor Author

rm-gh-8 commented Dec 8, 2025

/approval request for backport of JDK-8368182: AOT cache creation fails with class defined by JNI.

This backport has internal customer demand manifesting as an observable build error.

Low-medium risk - fixes a clear bug, but touches critical JVM initialization path.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 8, 2025

@rm-gh-8
8368182: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received labels Dec 8, 2025
@rm-gh-8
Copy link
Contributor Author

rm-gh-8 commented Dec 10, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Dec 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2025

@rm-gh-8
Your change (at version 919066e) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@shipilev
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2025

Going to push as commit 687c6a0.
Since your change was applied there have been 63 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Dec 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2025

@shipilev @rm-gh-8 Pushed as commit 687c6a0.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants