Skip to content

intake: upstream #1557 (intake/lote-A-pr-1557)#59

Closed
nsalvacao wants to merge 1 commit intobaseline/main-sync-2026-02-17from
intake/lote-A-pr-1557
Closed

intake: upstream #1557 (intake/lote-A-pr-1557)#59
nsalvacao wants to merge 1 commit intobaseline/main-sync-2026-02-17from
intake/lote-A-pr-1557

Conversation

@nsalvacao
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Intake PR (Review Phase)

Policy

  • This PR is for review and validation only.
  • Do not merge until Gemini/Copilot review + local validation are complete.
  • We will follow the 7-step integration workflow.

Resolves inconsistency where line 92 stated 'Maximum of 10 total questions'
while all other references (lines 2, 91, 100, 134, 158, 178) consistently
specify a maximum of 5 questions.

Co-authored-by: Augment Agent <noreply@augmentcode.com>
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of Changes

Hello @nsalvacao, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request integrates an upstream fix that resolves an inconsistency in the clarify command template. The change specifically harmonizes the maximum number of clarification questions allowed, aligning a previously conflicting limit with the intended design.

Highlights

  • Question Limit Correction: Corrected a conflicting question limit within the clarify command template from 10 to 5, ensuring consistency with the stated maximum of 5 questions.
Changelog
  • templates/commands/clarify.md
    • Updated the maximum total questions allowed in a session from 10 to 5 to match the intended limit.
Activity
  • The pull request is currently in a review and validation phase.
  • Merging is pending completion of Gemini/Copilot review and local validation.
  • The integration process will follow a 7-step workflow.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request addresses an inconsistency in the clarify.md command template by changing the maximum number of questions per session from 10 to 5. This makes the documentation consistent, as other parts of the file already refer to a limit of 5. The change is correct and improves the clarity of the instructions. I have added one minor suggestion related to this change to further improve conciseness in the future.


3. Generate (internally) a prioritized queue of candidate clarification questions (maximum 5). Do NOT output them all at once. Apply these constraints:
- Maximum of 10 total questions across the whole session.
- Maximum of 5 total questions across the whole session.
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This change correctly aligns the total question limit with the queue generation limit mentioned on the previous line, resolving the contradiction. To further improve conciseness, you could consider removing the (maximum 5) specification from line 91 in a future change, as this constraint is now clearly and singularly defined here.

nsalvacao added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2026
The clarify command template was internally inconsistent:
- Line 91: 'prioritized queue of candidate clarification questions (maximum 5)'
- Line 92: 'Maximum of 10 total questions across the whole session'

Align both to 5. The description already states 5 correctly; the
10-question cap was a copy-paste error introduced when the template
was first written.

Closes #59 (upstream: github#1557)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@nsalvacao nsalvacao deleted the intake/lote-A-pr-1557 branch February 26, 2026 09:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants