-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 399
Bumping project version and updating gitignore #901
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bumping project version and updating gitignore #901
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @michelebastione, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on routine maintenance, including incrementing the project's preview version, cleaning up the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request bumps the project version, updates the .gitignore file, and renames a test method for clarity. The changes are mostly good. I've left one comment regarding a potentially confusing configuration property name that is highlighted by the changes in the test file. Otherwise, the changes look correct.
|
|
||
| [Fact] | ||
| public async Task EnableWriteFilePathTest() | ||
| public async Task DisableWriteFilePathTest() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While the new test name DisableWriteFilePathTest accurately reflects that it's testing with EnableWriteFilePath = false, the property name EnableWriteFilePath itself seems potentially misleading. The test logic suggests this property controls whether image data (byte[]) is exported, not file paths. The assertion Assert.True(rows.All(x => x.Img is null or [])) confirms that when this property is false, the image content is not written. For better code clarity and maintainability, consider renaming EnableWriteFilePath to something more descriptive like EnableImageExport or WriteImageContent in a future change. This would make the configuration option's purpose clearer to users of the library.
No description provided.