Skip to content

Conversation

@michelebastione
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @michelebastione, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on routine maintenance, including incrementing the project's preview version, cleaning up the .gitignore file to better manage ignored files, and a minor refactoring of a test method name for clarity. These changes contribute to better project hygiene and preparation for future releases.

Highlights

  • Project Version Bump: The project's preview version has been updated from 2.0.0-preview.1 to 2.0.0-preview.2 in src/Directory.Build.props.
  • Gitignore Refinement: The .gitignore file has been updated to remove several outdated or unnecessary entries, including paths for test packages, sample files, and test optimization directories. A path for a test data file was also adjusted.
  • Test Method Renaming: A test method in tests/MiniExcel.Core.Tests/MiniExcelOpenXmlConfigurationTest.cs was renamed from EnableWriteFilePathTest to DisableWriteFilePathTest.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request bumps the project version, updates the .gitignore file, and renames a test method for clarity. The changes are mostly good. I've left one comment regarding a potentially confusing configuration property name that is highlighted by the changes in the test file. Otherwise, the changes look correct.


[Fact]
public async Task EnableWriteFilePathTest()
public async Task DisableWriteFilePathTest()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While the new test name DisableWriteFilePathTest accurately reflects that it's testing with EnableWriteFilePath = false, the property name EnableWriteFilePath itself seems potentially misleading. The test logic suggests this property controls whether image data (byte[]) is exported, not file paths. The assertion Assert.True(rows.All(x => x.Img is null or [])) confirms that when this property is false, the image content is not written. For better code clarity and maintainability, consider renaming EnableWriteFilePath to something more descriptive like EnableImageExport or WriteImageContent in a future change. This would make the configuration option's purpose clearer to users of the library.

@michelebastione michelebastione merged commit 10cd617 into mini-software:master Nov 16, 2025
3 checks passed
@michelebastione michelebastione deleted the v2.0.0-preview.2 branch November 16, 2025 21:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant