draft: Thinking about zero-copy data exchange with Python (& Arrow)#29
Closed
kylebarron wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
draft: Thinking about zero-copy data exchange with Python (& Arrow)#29kylebarron wants to merge 2 commits into
kylebarron wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Background:
I was exploring #26, exploring variable-length string types. But that's annoying because there's no zero-copy sharing between the Zarr string layout and the Numpy v2 string layout. So that would require a full memory copy, and, until PyO3/rust-numpy#505 is implemented, there's no save way to convert to/from numpy v2 in (safe, high level) Rust Numpy API.
However, the variable length string/bytes types in Zarr are exactly the same binary layout as the Arrow StringArray/BinaryArray layout. This got me thinking about adding Arrow as another serialization option. (It would expose contiguous Zarr arrays as a 1D array, plus an attribute on Data describing the
shape)So the general idea here is: the
Dataobject should be fully generic. Faithful to Zarr, not preferring any one serialization format. It should support:ArrayBytestype) for the Python consumer to copy into whatever format they'd like