-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
Criegee22 Benchmark #256
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Criegee22 Benchmark #256
Conversation
d159f22 to
52ced0f
Compare
52ced0f to
8ea39b3
Compare
| model_dir = DATA_PATH / MODELS[0] | ||
| if model_dir.exists(): | ||
| labels = sorted([f.stem for f in model_dir.glob("*.xyz")]) | ||
| structs = [ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So this currently returns a list of length 44, since we store two structures for "rct" and "ts" states separately.
This potentially leads to a mismatch in the structures. We could filter this by name, or alternatively, would it actually be useful to visualise each pair for each scatter? If so I'd suggest we save them in a single file.
Pre-review checklist for PR author
PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.
Summary
Criegee22 dataset for reactions involving Crieegee intermediates.
C. D. Smith, A. Karton. J. Comput. Chem. 2020, 41, 328–339.
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.26106
Linked issue
Resolves #
Progress
Testing
MACE-OMOL, MACE-OMOL-LR, ORBMOL
New decorators/callbacks