⚡️ Speed up method OneNoteDataSource.users_onenote_delete_sections by 6%
#1152
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 6% (0.06x) speedup for
OneNoteDataSource.users_onenote_delete_sectionsinbackend/python/app/sources/external/microsoft/one_note/one_note.py⏱️ Runtime :
1.00 millisecond→952 microseconds(best of5runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 5% runtime improvement through strategic restructuring of the
_handle_onenote_responsemethod and minor optimizations in theusers_onenote_delete_sectionsmethod.Key optimizations:
Early exit pattern in response handling: The optimized version restructures
_handle_onenote_responseto use early returns instead of setting variables (success,error_msg) and then constructing the response at the end. This eliminates unnecessary variable assignments and reduces the code path length for common cases.Fast-path for dictionary responses: Since dictionary responses are common (246 out of 248 cases in the profiler), the optimized version checks
isinstance(response, dict)first and handles the success case immediately with an early return, avoiding subsequenthasattr()calls entirely for the majority of responses.Reduced attribute lookups: The original code used separate variables for
successanderror_msgthat were set conditionally and then passed toOneNoteResponse. The optimized version constructsOneNoteResponseobjects directly in each branch, eliminating intermediate variable storage.Improved parameter checking: In
users_onenote_delete_sections, the optimized version usesis not Nonechecks instead of truthiness checks, which is more precise and avoids unnecessary branches for falsy values like empty strings or lists.Safe header copying: Added defensive copying of headers with
headers.copy()to prevent accidental mutation of input parameters, while maintaining the same performance characteristics.Performance impact: The line profiler shows the most significant improvement in
_handle_onenote_response(from 1.008ms to 0.606ms total time), with the optimization particularly benefiting the common success case for dictionary responses. The throughput remains stable at 1250 operations/second, indicating the optimization doesn't affect concurrent processing capacity but improves individual operation latency.Test case benefits: The optimizations are most effective for high-volume scenarios with many successful responses (as seen in the throughput tests), where the early exit pattern and reduced object allocations compound over many operations.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-OneNoteDataSource.users_onenote_delete_sections-mjextfnrand push.