Skip to content

Conversation

@dttung2905
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@dttung2905 dttung2905 marked this pull request as ready for review May 6, 2025 19:09
@Shreyas220
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @dttung2905, just wanted to check if you're still actively working on this PR. If not, I'd be happy to pick it up and continue. Let me know your thoughts!

@dttung2905
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @dttung2905, just wanted to check if you're still actively working on this PR. If not, I'd be happy to pick it up and continue. Let me know your thoughts!

Hello 👋, yes, i was still working on it. Its taking longer than usual sorry. Will update the code some time today for review

@dttung2905 dttung2905 force-pushed the add-views-related-ops-sql branch from 80ce8a4 to 2b6e025 Compare May 18, 2025 17:10
Copy link
Member

@zeroshade zeroshade left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just a few comments but overall looks good to me so far.

Is there any way we can set up an integration test to compare against other implementations?

@dttung2905
Copy link
Contributor Author

just a few comments but overall looks good to me so far.

Is there any way we can set up an integration test to compare against other implementations?

@zeroshade Thanks for the review. I have made some changes for the linting which should make the CI passes. Regarding the integration test, I think its a good idea. I'm working on something similar to rest_integration_test.go but for SQL catalog. Since this PR is getting substantially big to review, can I include the integration in the next PR ? wdyt ?

@zeroshade
Copy link
Member

A follow up PR for the integration test is fine. If you're not gonna start immediately after this gets merged, then let's file an issue to track it so we don't forget. But if you'll be following up quickly with the test, no need for an issue. 😄

@dttung2905
Copy link
Contributor Author

@zeroshade It seems like the go-integration test is failing which other PR also encounters. I don't think it is related to any changes related to this PR. Do you have any idea how to fix it? I will try to rebase from main to see if the CI passes

@dttung2905 dttung2905 force-pushed the add-views-related-ops-sql branch from 62aa3b3 to 43a8540 Compare May 27, 2025 22:45
@zeroshade
Copy link
Member

@dttung2905 this is super weird. I can't replicate the failure locally. It looks like it's getting some kind of error trying to write to the minio instance. @Fokko @kevinjqliu any ideas what could be going wrong here? Looks like it's failing inside of pyiceberg's catalog.create_table call saying the specified bucket doesn't exist in the minio instance.

@zeroshade
Copy link
Member

@dttung2905 figured out the issue, #444 fixes it so you can rebase once that gets merged.

@dttung2905
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dttung2905 figured out the issue, #444 fixes it so you can rebase once that gets merged.

Sure. Let me rebase it again in a few hours. Thanks alot for the quick fix

dttung2905 added 10 commits May 28, 2025 21:59
Signed-off-by: dttung2905 <ttdao.2015@accountancy.smu.edu.sg>
Signed-off-by: dttung2905 <ttdao.2015@accountancy.smu.edu.sg>
Signed-off-by: dttung2905 <ttdao.2015@accountancy.smu.edu.sg>
Signed-off-by: dttung2905 <ttdao.2015@accountancy.smu.edu.sg>
Signed-off-by: dttung2905 <ttdao.2015@accountancy.smu.edu.sg>
Signed-off-by: dttung2905 <ttdao.2015@accountancy.smu.edu.sg>
Signed-off-by: dttung2905 <ttdao.2015@accountancy.smu.edu.sg>
Signed-off-by: dttung2905 <ttdao.2015@accountancy.smu.edu.sg>
Signed-off-by: dttung2905 <ttdao.2015@accountancy.smu.edu.sg>
Signed-off-by: dttung2905 <ttdao.2015@accountancy.smu.edu.sg>
Signed-off-by: dttung2905 <ttdao.2015@accountancy.smu.edu.sg>
Signed-off-by: dttung2905 <ttdao.2015@accountancy.smu.edu.sg>
@dttung2905 dttung2905 requested a review from zeroshade June 10, 2025 20:32
Signed-off-by: dttung2905 <ttdao.2015@accountancy.smu.edu.sg>
Signed-off-by: dttung2905 <ttdao.2015@accountancy.smu.edu.sg>
Signed-off-by: dttung2905 <ttdao.2015@accountancy.smu.edu.sg>
Copy link
Member

@zeroshade zeroshade left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome, thanks!

@zeroshade zeroshade merged commit 60abc85 into apache:main Jun 20, 2025
10 checks passed
zeroshade pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2025
Hi team,
This PR fixes #442

Will need the PR #414 to be
merged first before I can uncomment one of the integration test case

---------

Signed-off-by: dttung2905 <ttdao.2015@accountancy.smu.edu.sg>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants