Update vendored llnl dependency from upstream spack

[douglasjacobsen]

Pulled from Spack commit: a534e6456a11aae3f3306a964eb60a9fb2c4ee91

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request refactors and modernizes the terminal and logging utilities in llnl/util/tty, introducing type annotations, f-strings, and standard library alternatives like shutil.get_terminal_size(), while restructuring the multiprocessing-based logging daemon for Unix and Windows. The code review highlights several improvement opportunities: a potential bug in log.py where select.select on a buffered TextIOWrapper can cause output to get stuck, a missing row-length validation in colify_table that could lead to an IndexError, redundant runtime type checks and type annotations in colify.py and __init__.py, and a redundant bool() cast in config.py.

[ramble-pr-bot]

Ramble Performance Test Metrics

Results produced with commit: ba96981

Test Name	Outcome	Duration (s)	Most Recent Run (s)	Last 5 Avg (s)
test_analyze_large_file	passed	2.9544	2.9091 (9c8946e)	2.9173
test_large_template_expansion	passed	2.1210	2.1383 (9c8946e)	2.1327
test_many_experiments	passed	35.9016	38.0281 (9c8946e)	36.8601
test_many_objects_defaults	passed	18.9098	20.5260 (9c8946e)	19.7596
test_matrix_filter_perf	passed	1.5920	1.6322 (9c8946e)	1.6089

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.29%. Comparing base (93379c1) to head (ba96981).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
lib/ramble/ramble/cmd/config.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (0.00%) is below the target coverage (90.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1644   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    93.29%   93.29%           
========================================
  Files          352      352           
  Lines        34181    34181           
========================================
  Hits         31889    31889           
  Misses        2292     2292           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[douglasjacobsen]

The codecov information is because we ignore the lines in this PR, so the test covers 0% of the lines as a result. But they are actually all tested...

[linsword13]

The codecov information is because we ignore the lines in this PR, so the test covers 0% of the lines as a result. But they are actually all tested...

Hm interesting, if we ignore the lines then I'd assume codecov should ignore that too...

Oh I think it's complaining about the one-line change in config.py.

[linsword13]

Love the update, glad that it seems to be a straightforward drop-in. One question: do we want to pull from a tagged release instead of from the head?