chore: Add configuration files for Gemini PR reviews#7577
Conversation
![claude[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1236702?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Claude Code Review
This repository is configured for manual code reviews. Comment @claude review to trigger a review and subscribe this PR to future pushes, or @claude review once for a one-time review.
Tip: disable this comment in your organization's Code Review settings.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. 3 Skipped Deployments
|
|
Note Gemini is unable to generate a review for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported. |
Docker builds report
|
Playwright Test Results (oss - depot-ubuntu-latest-16)
Details
Playwright Test Results (oss - depot-ubuntu-latest-arm-16)
Details
Playwright Test Results (private-cloud - depot-ubuntu-latest-arm-16)
Details
Playwright Test Results (private-cloud - depot-ubuntu-latest-16)
Details
|
Visual Regression19 screenshots compared. See report for details. |
| pull_request_opened: | ||
| help: false | ||
| summary: false | ||
| code_review: false | ||
| include_drafts: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The defaults here are as per the following suggestion (to show the diff, not to be committed)
| pull_request_opened: | |
| help: false | |
| summary: false | |
| code_review: false | |
| include_drafts: false | |
| pull_request_opened: | |
| help: false | |
| summary: false | |
| code_review: true | |
| include_drafts: true |
I've chosen to turn off all automated PR reviews in favour of using the manual review option, at least to begin with.
|
|
||
| code_review: | ||
| disable: false | ||
| comment_severity_threshold: HIGH |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is the non-default, the default is MEDIUM.
matthewelwell
changed the title
|
|
||
| > *Written feedback lacks tone. Neutral language prevents misinterpretation and keeps reviews collaborative.* | ||
|
|
||
| ### PR012: Approve when the PR improves code health, not when it's perfect |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we add an instruction so that it does give a recommendation whether it would or not approve the PR ? I think it's adding comments without siding
2 participants
Thanks for submitting a PR! Please check the boxes below:
docs/if required so people know about the feature.Changes
Adds configuration file for gemini code reviews as per schema here. Note that I have populated all fields, using default values where sufficient for our usage as I preferred to be explicit rather than implicit. Happy to remove default values if requested.
I also added the style guide, currently just pulled directly from the Notion page on our approach to PRs here.
How did you test this code?
N/a - will need testing with gemini code review after merge.