style: Potential fixes for 2 code quality findings in tests/zip_crypto.rs

[Pr0methean]

This PR applies 2/2 suggestions from code quality AI findings.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @Pr0methean, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on refining the test suite by implementing targeted code quality improvements. The changes aim to make the test code more understandable and maintainable, specifically by clarifying the purpose of certain constants and improving naming conventions within cryptographic tests.

Highlights

• Code Quality Improvements: This pull request addresses two code quality findings identified by AI, focusing on improving the clarity and maintainability of the test suite.
• Test Code Readability: Enhanced the readability of tests/zip_crypto.rs by adding a descriptive comment for the ARCHIVE_BUFFER_SIZE constant and renaming PARTIAL_READ_TRIGGER_BUFFER_SIZE to TEST_BUFFER_SIZE for better context.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[amazon-q-developer]

The code changes look good and improve code quality through better documentation and clearer naming. However, the PR title doesn't conform to the required Conventional Commits format. Please update the title to start with an appropriate type prefix such as docs: (for documentation improvements) or refactor: (for code restructuring without functional changes). For example: docs: improve test constant documentation and naming.

---

You can now have the agent implement changes and create commits directly on your pull request's source branch. Simply comment with /q followed by your request in natural language to ask the agent to make changes.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request applies two changes from an AI code quality tool. The first change, which adds a comment to explain a constant's value, is a good improvement for code clarity. However, the second change, which renames a constant from PARTIAL_READ_TRIGGER_BUFFER_SIZE to TEST_BUFFER_SIZE, makes the code less readable. The original name was more descriptive of the constant's purpose. The comment suggesting to revert this name change is valid and has been retained to maintain code clarity.