style: Potential fixes for 2 code quality findings in tests/wasm32.rs (comments)

[Pr0methean]

This PR applies 2/2 suggestions from code quality AI findings.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @Pr0methean, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request implements two minor code quality improvements by refining existing comments within the tests/wasm32.rs file. The changes enhance the clarity and accuracy of instructions and explanations related to testing setups, contributing to better code readability and maintainability.

Highlights

• Test Command Clarification: Updated a comment in tests/wasm32.rs to provide a more explicit instruction for running AES encryption tests, detailing the wasm-pack command with required features.
• Feature Requirement Comment Correction: Corrected a comment in tests/wasm32.rs to accurately state 'the wasm-bindgen feature' instead of 'the features wasm-bindgen' when referring to the time functionality.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[amazon-q-developer]

This PR applies two minor documentation improvements that enhance code clarity:

1. Line 24: Improves the doc comment for the AES test function by adding descriptive text and better formatting
2. Line 52: Fixes a grammatical error in the comment about wasm-bindgen feature requirements

Both changes are purely documentation improvements that don't affect functionality. The code remains working and correct. No blocking issues identified for merge.

---

You can now have the agent implement changes and create commits directly on your pull request's source branch. Simply comment with /q followed by your request in natural language to ask the agent to make changes.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request includes two minor clarifications to comments within the tests/wasm32.rs file. These changes improve the readability and accuracy of the comments, specifically regarding the execution instructions for AES encryption tests and the feature requirement for the time dependency. These are positive, albeit minor, code quality improvements.