style: Potential fix for 1 code quality finding in tests/zip_crypto.rs (comment line break)

[Pr0methean]

This PR applies 1/1 suggestions from code quality AI findings.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @Pr0methean, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a code quality finding by enhancing the documentation within a test file. The change specifically refines a comment to provide a clearer explanation of a chosen buffer size, ensuring that the test's intent and behavior are easily understood by future readers and maintainers. This improves the overall maintainability and clarity of the test suite.

Highlights

• Comment Clarification: The comment explaining the rationale behind the PARTIAL_READ_TRIGGER_BUFFER_SIZE in the test_partial_buffer_read_crypto function within tests/zip_crypto.rs has been rephrased for improved clarity and readability.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[amazon-q-developer]

This PR improves the clarity and readability of a comment in the test file. The change is purely cosmetic - it restructures the comment explaining buffer capacity selection to be more concise and better organized. No functional code is modified, and the test behavior remains identical. The improvement enhances code maintainability without introducing any issues.

---

You can now have the agent implement changes and create commits directly on your pull request's source branch. Simply comment with /q followed by your request in natural language to ask the agent to make changes.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request improves the clarity of a comment within a test case in tests/zip_crypto.rs. The change refactors a long sentence into multiple, more digestible lines, making the rationale for the chosen buffer size easier to understand. This is a good, minor improvement to code readability. I have no further suggestions.