test: Fix wasm-pack test on Node

[Its-Just-Nans]

Fix #608

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @Its-Just-Nans, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses an issue (#608) related to wasm-pack test configurations. It modifies the tests/wasm32.rs file by removing a specific wasm_bindgen_test configuration macro, which likely enables more dynamic control over test execution environments, possibly through environment variables, and includes a minor import refactoring.

Highlights

• Wasm Test Configuration: The wasm_bindgen_test_configure!(run_in_browser); macro call has been removed from tests/wasm32.rs. This change likely allows for more flexible test execution environments, potentially controlled by an environment variable, as suggested by the pull request title.
• Import Refactoring: The wasm_bindgen_test import in tests/wasm32.rs has been refactored from a wildcard import (*) to a specific import for wasm_bindgen_test.

Ignored Files

• Ignored by pattern: .github/workflows/** (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yaml

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[amazon-q-developer]

This PR correctly addresses the wasm-pack test issue by implementing conditional environment variable setting based on the test execution context. The changes are well-structured:

1. CI Workflow: Properly conditionally sets WASM_BINDGEN_USE_BROWSER=1 only for browser testing scenarios, avoiding conflicts with Node.js tests
2. Test Configuration: Removes hardcoded browser configuration and uses more specific imports, allowing the test runner to be controlled by environment variables

The implementation follows the conventional commit format and addresses the reported issue effectively. The changes are minimal, focused, and maintain backward compatibility while fixing the test execution problem.

---

You can now have the agent implement changes and create commits directly on your pull request's source branch. Simply comment with /q followed by your request in natural language to ask the agent to make changes.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request fixes a build failure for the wasm32-wasi target. The original comment suggests a more robust solution using conditional compilation to avoid unintended side effects on other wasm32 targets, which has been retained as it aligns with general best practices and does not contradict any specific rules.