Skip to content

ci(trunk): refresh caller workflow#36

Merged
ss-o merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
issue-408-trunk-caller
May 19, 2026
Merged

ci(trunk): refresh caller workflow#36
ss-o merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
issue-408-trunk-caller

Conversation

@ss-o
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ss-o ss-o commented May 19, 2026

Summary

  • Update the Trunk caller workflow to the refreshed org-level single-job shape from ci(trunk): refresh reusable workflow .github#404.
  • Remove stale commented upload-token scheduling from the caller.
  • Add explicit permissions, concurrency, and arguments: --no-progress.

Part of z-shell/.github#408.

Verification

  • Workflow-only change to .github/workflows/trunk-check.yml.
  • YAML shape reviewed after writing the workflow.

Agent handoff

Status: Ready for review
Current state: PR contains only the Trunk caller refresh.
Blockers: None known.
Next steps: Wait for PR CI; merge if green.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 19, 2026 04:07
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR refreshes the repository’s Trunk “caller” GitHub Actions workflow to match the updated org-level single-job reusable workflow pattern, while removing stale scheduled/upload-token logic and tightening runtime controls.

Changes:

  • Updates workflow name and pull request trigger types (adds reopened).
  • Adds explicit permissions and concurrency settings for the workflow/job.
  • Passes arguments: --no-progress to the reusable Trunk workflow.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@ss-o ss-o merged commit 00cf9b4 into main May 19, 2026
7 checks passed
@ss-o ss-o deleted the issue-408-trunk-caller branch May 19, 2026 04:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants