Skip to content

feat: yield splitter#1095

Draft
0xeye wants to merge 6 commits intomainfrom
feat/ysplitter
Draft

feat: yield splitter#1095
0xeye wants to merge 6 commits intomainfrom
feat/ysplitter

Conversation

@0xeye
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@0xeye 0xeye commented Mar 3, 2026

Explore ways yield splitter can be incorporated into yearn.fi app without bloat / complicating ux.

0xeye added 4 commits March 2, 2026 15:38
* chore: partial migration feature

* feat: cleanup

* feat: adjust location of text

* chore: rebase fixes

* chore: cleanup on aisle 3

* feat: refine selection for user

* chore: rename hooks to clarify use

* chore: remove allocator suggestions, filter low yield
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Mar 3, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
yearnfi Ready Ready Preview, Comment Mar 19, 2026 11:34am

Request Review

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Mar 3, 2026

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None

Base automatically changed from release/03-16-26 to main March 12, 2026 17:25
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@murderteeth murderteeth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

from telegram

i like where the split option sits in the flow. feels like a tooltip makes sense on hover "Optionally earn your yield in:"

also when i select ETH or BTC, it forces the deposit token select to vbUSDC and disables the selector. maybe intentional? i'll add notes to the pr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@murderteeth murderteeth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wireframe with some ideas
Image

also regarding copy

"Optionally earn your yield in:" -- Gets the job done. But it reads a bit awkward to me. The goal of the text here is to label the split setting. It's also not nessesary to point out that its optional as long as the default state is neither selected and the feature itself is a secondary part of the flow. Makes sense to clarify its optional in the tooltip tho.

For me, "Auto-convert yield to" is more concise and explains the feature clearly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants