Skip to content

typo in the text #40

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
danish-moengage wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

typo in the text #40

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion README.markdown
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
Code licensed under the Apache 2.0 license. See LICENSE file for terms.

### Background
At Yahoo we have adopted [Apache Storm](https://storm.apache.org) as our stream processing platform of choice. But that was in 2012 and the landscape has changed significantly since then. Because of this we really want to know what Storm is good at, where it needs to be improved compared to other systems, and what its limitations are compared to other tools so we can recommend the best tool for the job to our customers. To do this we started to look for stream processing benchmarks that we could use to do this evaluation, but all of them ended up lacking in several fundamental areas. Primarily they did not test anything close to a read world use case, so we decided to write a simple one. This is the first round of these tests. The tool here is not polished and only covers three tools and one specific use case. We hope to expand this in the future in terms of the tools tested, the variety of processing tested, and the metrics gathered.
At Yahoo we have adopted [Apache Storm](https://storm.apache.org) as our stream processing platform of choice. But that was in 2012 and the landscape has changed significantly since then. Because of this we really want to know what Storm is good at, where it needs to be improved compared to other systems, and what its limitations are compared to other tools so we can recommend the best tool for the job to our customers. To do this we started to look for stream processing benchmarks that we could use to do this evaluation, but all of them ended up lacking in several fundamental areas. Primarily they did not test anything close to a real world use case, so we decided to write a simple one. This is the first round of these tests. The tool here is not polished and only covers three tools and one specific use case. We hope to expand this in the future in terms of the tools tested, the variety of processing tested, and the metrics gathered.

### Setup
We provide a script stream-bench.sh to setup and run the tests on a single node, and to act as an example of what to do when running the tests on a multi-node system. Also, you need to have leiningen installed on your machines before you start the tests (e.g., on Mac OS, you can install by "brew install leiningen").
Expand Down