Skip to content

Conversation

@samnazarko
Copy link
Contributor

The previous commit c145e3c resolves the issue for GCC 15.

However, omitting parameter names in function definitions is a C23 feature. This thus causes configuration to fail with a GCC 9 host compiler.

The previous commit c145e3c resolves the issue for GCC 15.

However, omitting parameter names in function definitions is a C23 feature.
This thus causes configuration to fail with a GCC 9 host compiler.

Signed-off-by: Sam Nazarko <email@samnazarko.co.uk>
@phunkyfish
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi Sam, we probbaly need this on the Piers branch before we bring it onto Omega.

@samnazarko
Copy link
Contributor Author

samnazarko commented Dec 25, 2025

Actually I don’t think we to, because Piers has new minimum C++ requirements anyway and effectively forces the necessity for new tool chains.

@phunkyfish
Copy link
Collaborator

Gotcha, will merge this so.

@phunkyfish phunkyfish merged commit 3c59649 into xbmc:Omega Dec 28, 2025
7 of 9 checks passed
@garbear
Copy link
Member

garbear commented Jan 19, 2026

Just to verify, this change isn't needed for Piers?

@samnazarko
Copy link
Contributor Author

samnazarko commented Jan 19, 2026 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants