Skip to content

fix(ai-transformation): development-ai-transformation#700

Open
akulakum wants to merge 1 commit into
webex:nextfrom
akulakum:TEST_USER_GUIDE
Open

fix(ai-transformation): development-ai-transformation#700
akulakum wants to merge 1 commit into
webex:nextfrom
akulakum:TEST_USER_GUIDE

Conversation

@akulakum

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

COMPLETES #< INSERT LINK TO ISSUE >

This pull request addresses

< DESCRIBE THE CONTEXT OF THE ISSUE >

by making the following changes

< DESCRIBE YOUR CHANGES >

Change Type

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update
  • Tooling change
  • Internal code refactor

The following scenarios were tested

  • The testing is done with the amplify link
    < ENUMERATE TESTS PERFORMED, WHETHER MANUAL OR AUTOMATED >

The GAI Coding Policy And Copyright Annotation Best Practices

  • GAI was not used (or, no additional notation is required)
  • Code was generated entirely by GAI
  • GAI was used to create a draft that was subsequently customized or modified
  • Coder created a draft manually that was non-substantively modified by GAI (e.g., refactoring was performed by GAI on manually written code)
  • Tool used for AI assistance (GitHub Copilot / Other - specify)
    • Github Copilot
    • Other - Please Specify
  • This PR is related to
    • Feature
    • Defect fix
    • Tech Debt
    • Automation

Checklist before merging

  • I have not skipped any automated checks
  • All existing and new tests passed
  • I have updated the testing document
  • I have tested the functionality with amplify link

Make sure to have followed the contributing guidelines before submitting.

@akulakum akulakum requested a review from a team as a code owner June 12, 2026 09:10

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8d58b5f5e7

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

- Post intake JSON comment (see [development-phase-plan.md](../../ai-docs/harness/development-phase-plan.md) §8.2)

```
mcp__jira__add_labels(issueKey="{TICKET_ID}", labels=["dev-ready", "dev-in-progress"])

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Use the Jira label parameter expected by MCP

The existing Jira MCP examples in this repo call mcp__jira__add_labels with issue_key (for example, .claude/commands/scrub.md and .claude/commands/fix.md), but the new dev workflow uses issueKey here and in /dev-pr and /dev-post-merge. When /dev-start reaches the label step, the parent agent will try to call the tool with the wrong argument name, so the ticket will not get the dev-ready/dev-in-progress state that later stages use as durable workflow state. Please use issue_key consistently in the new dev commands.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

### Step 3: Worktree

```bash
git worktree add /tmp/claude-widgets/{TICKET_ID} -b {TICKET_ID}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Base development worktrees on next

When /dev-start is run from any checkout other than the latest next, this creates {TICKET_ID} from the caller's current HEAD because git worktree add -h shows the base commit is the optional <commit-ish> argument and none is supplied here. The PR flow later targets next, so a dev ticket can include stale or unrelated commits in its branch; the existing /fix workflow avoids this by fetching upstream next and passing upstream/next. Fetch and supply the next ref here (and in the duplicate snippet in 00-master.md).

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@aws-amplify-us-east-2

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request is automatically being deployed by Amplify Hosting (learn more).

Access this pull request here: https://pr-700.d1b38q61t1z947.amplifyapp.com

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant