Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
147 changes: 75 additions & 72 deletions axiom_tables/axiom_violations_dominance_axioms_profile.html

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

61 changes: 32 additions & 29 deletions axiom_tables/axiom_violations_dominance_axioms_profilewithties.html

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

153 changes: 78 additions & 75 deletions axiom_tables/axiom_violations_invariance_axioms_profile.html

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

89 changes: 46 additions & 43 deletions axiom_tables/axiom_violations_monotonicity_axioms_profile.html

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion axiom_tables/axiom_violations_profile.json

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion axiom_tables/axiom_violations_profilewithties.json

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

61 changes: 32 additions & 29 deletions axiom_tables/axiom_violations_strategic_axioms_profile.html

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

55 changes: 29 additions & 26 deletions axiom_tables/axiom_violations_strategic_axioms_profilewithties.html

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

111 changes: 57 additions & 54 deletions axiom_tables/axiom_violations_variable_candidate_axioms_profile.html

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

137 changes: 70 additions & 67 deletions axiom_tables/axiom_violations_variable_voter_axioms_profile.html

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta charset='utf-8'><title>Anti-Plurality – Reinforcement (citation)</title>
<style>
body, table, h1, h2, p, ul, li { font-family: Arial, sans-serif; }

h1 { margin-bottom: .2em; }
h2 { margin-top: 0; font-size: 1.1em; color: #444; }

a { color: #0066cc; text-decoration: none; }
a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }

ul { margin: 0.5em 0; padding-left: 2em; }
li { margin: 0.3em 0; }
</style>
</head><body><h1>Anti-Plurality</h1>
<h2>Citation for Reinforcement</h2>
<p><b>Profile&nbsp;type:</b> Profile</p>
<p><b>Notes:</b></p>
<p>Young (1975) states that every scoring rule satisfies reinforcement (also called &#x27;consistency&#x27;). Anti-plurality is a scoring rule; hence it satisfies reinforcement.</p>
<p><b>Sources:</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href='http://www.jstor.org/stable/2100365' target='_blank'>http://www.jstor.org/stable/2100365</a></li>
</ul>
</body></html>
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta charset='utf-8'><title>Anti-Plurality – Weak Positive Responsiveness (citation)</title>
<style>
body, table, h1, h2, p, ul, li { font-family: Arial, sans-serif; }

h1 { margin-bottom: .2em; }
h2 { margin-top: 0; font-size: 1.1em; color: #444; }

a { color: #0066cc; text-decoration: none; }
a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }

ul { margin: 0.5em 0; padding-left: 2em; }
li { margin: 0.3em 0; }
</style>
</head><body><h1>Anti-Plurality</h1>
<h2>Citation for Weak Positive Responsiveness</h2>
<p><b>Profile&nbsp;type:</b> Profile</p>
<p><b>Notes:</b></p>
<p>Holliday and Pacuit (2025) note that all proper scoring rules (in the sense of Zwicker 2016, Def. 2.9) satisfy weak positive responsiveness. As a positional scoring rule, this covers the method.</p>
<p><b>Sources:</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href='https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00355-025-01598-7' target='_blank'>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00355-025-01598-7</a></li>
<li><a href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.14256' target='_blank'>https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.14256</a></li>
</ul>
</body></html>
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta charset='utf-8'><title>Baldwin – Condorcet Winner (citation)</title>
<style>
body, table, h1, h2, p, ul, li { font-family: Arial, sans-serif; }

h1 { margin-bottom: .2em; }
h2 { margin-top: 0; font-size: 1.1em; color: #444; }

a { color: #0066cc; text-decoration: none; }
a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }

ul { margin: 0.5em 0; padding-left: 2em; }
li { margin: 0.3em 0; }
</style>
</head><body><h1>Baldwin</h1>
<h2>Citation for Condorcet Winner</h2>
<p><b>Profile&nbsp;type:</b> Profile</p>
<p><b>Notes:</b></p>
<p>Schulze (2011, Table 2) notes that Baldwin is a Condorcet method.</p>
<p><b>Sources:</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href='https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0475-4' target='_blank'>https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0475-4</a></li>
</ul>
</body></html>
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta charset='utf-8'><title>Beat Path – Condorcet Winner (citation)</title>
<style>
body, table, h1, h2, p, ul, li { font-family: Arial, sans-serif; }

h1 { margin-bottom: .2em; }
h2 { margin-top: 0; font-size: 1.1em; color: #444; }

a { color: #0066cc; text-decoration: none; }
a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }

ul { margin: 0.5em 0; padding-left: 2em; }
li { margin: 0.3em 0; }
</style>
</head><body><h1>Beat Path</h1>
<h2>Citation for Condorcet Winner</h2>
<p><b>Profile&nbsp;type:</b> Profile</p>
<p><b>Notes:</b></p>
<p>Schulze (2011, Sect. 4.7) proves that Beat Path satisfies the Condorcet criterion (as a special case of the Smith criterion).</p>
<p><b>Sources:</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href='https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0475-4' target='_blank'>https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0475-4</a></li>
</ul>
</body></html>
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta charset='utf-8'><title>Beat Path – Monotonicity (citation)</title>
<style>
body, table, h1, h2, p, ul, li { font-family: Arial, sans-serif; }

h1 { margin-bottom: .2em; }
h2 { margin-top: 0; font-size: 1.1em; color: #444; }

a { color: #0066cc; text-decoration: none; }
a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }

ul { margin: 0.5em 0; padding-left: 2em; }
li { margin: 0.3em 0; }
</style>
</head><body><h1>Beat Path</h1>
<h2>Citation for Monotonicity</h2>
<p><b>Profile&nbsp;type:</b> Profile</p>
<p><b>Notes:</b></p>
<p>Schulze (2011, Sect. 4.5) proves that Beat Path satisfies monotonicity.</p>
<p><b>Sources:</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href='https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0475-4' target='_blank'>https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0475-4</a></li>
</ul>
</body></html>
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta charset='utf-8'><title>Beat Path – Neutral Reversal (citation)</title>
<style>
body, table, h1, h2, p, ul, li { font-family: Arial, sans-serif; }

h1 { margin-bottom: .2em; }
h2 { margin-top: 0; font-size: 1.1em; color: #444; }

a { color: #0066cc; text-decoration: none; }
a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }

ul { margin: 0.5em 0; padding-left: 2em; }
li { margin: 0.3em 0; }
</style>
</head><body><h1>Beat Path</h1>
<h2>Citation for Neutral Reversal</h2>
<p><b>Profile&nbsp;type:</b> Profile</p>
<p><b>Notes:</b></p>
<p>Here we are assuming the margin-based version of Beat Path, and all margin-based methods satisfy neutral reversal.</p>
<p><b>Sources:</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.08595' target='_blank'>https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.08595</a></li>
</ul>
</body></html>
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta charset='utf-8'><title>Beat Path – Pareto Dominance Criterion (citation)</title>
<style>
body, table, h1, h2, p, ul, li { font-family: Arial, sans-serif; }

h1 { margin-bottom: .2em; }
h2 { margin-top: 0; font-size: 1.1em; color: #444; }

a { color: #0066cc; text-decoration: none; }
a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }

ul { margin: 0.5em 0; padding-left: 2em; }
li { margin: 0.3em 0; }
</style>
</head><body><h1>Beat Path</h1>
<h2>Citation for Pareto Dominance Criterion</h2>
<p><b>Profile&nbsp;type:</b> Profile</p>
<p><b>Notes:</b></p>
<p>Schulze (2011, Sect. 4.3) proves that Beat Path satisfies the Pareto criterion.</p>
<p><b>Sources:</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href='https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0475-4' target='_blank'>https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0475-4</a></li>
</ul>
</body></html>
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta charset='utf-8'><title>Beat Path – Smith (citation)</title>
<style>
body, table, h1, h2, p, ul, li { font-family: Arial, sans-serif; }

h1 { margin-bottom: .2em; }
h2 { margin-top: 0; font-size: 1.1em; color: #444; }

a { color: #0066cc; text-decoration: none; }
a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }

ul { margin: 0.5em 0; padding-left: 2em; }
li { margin: 0.3em 0; }
</style>
</head><body><h1>Beat Path</h1>
<h2>Citation for Smith</h2>
<p><b>Profile&nbsp;type:</b> Profile</p>
<p><b>Notes:</b></p>
<p>Schulze (2011, Sect. 4.7) proves that Beat Path satisfies the Smith criterion.</p>
<p><b>Sources:</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href='https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0475-4' target='_blank'>https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0475-4</a></li>
</ul>
</body></html>
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta charset='utf-8'><title>Borda – Condorcet Loser (citation)</title>
<style>
body, table, h1, h2, p, ul, li { font-family: Arial, sans-serif; }

h1 { margin-bottom: .2em; }
h2 { margin-top: 0; font-size: 1.1em; color: #444; }

a { color: #0066cc; text-decoration: none; }
a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }

ul { margin: 0.5em 0; padding-left: 2em; }
li { margin: 0.3em 0; }
</style>
</head><body><h1>Borda</h1>
<h2>Citation for Condorcet Loser</h2>
<p><b>Profile&nbsp;type:</b> Profile</p>
<p><b>Notes:</b></p>
<p>Felsenthal (2012, Table 3.2) states that Borda does not elect Condorcet losers.</p>
<p><b>Sources:</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href='https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_3' target='_blank'>https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_3</a></li>
</ul>
</body></html>
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta charset='utf-8'><title>Borda – Monotonicity (citation)</title>
<style>
body, table, h1, h2, p, ul, li { font-family: Arial, sans-serif; }

h1 { margin-bottom: .2em; }
h2 { margin-top: 0; font-size: 1.1em; color: #444; }

a { color: #0066cc; text-decoration: none; }
a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }

ul { margin: 0.5em 0; padding-left: 2em; }
li { margin: 0.3em 0; }
</style>
</head><body><h1>Borda</h1>
<h2>Citation for Monotonicity</h2>
<p><b>Profile&nbsp;type:</b> Profile</p>
<p><b>Notes:</b></p>
<p>Felsenthal (2012, Table 3.2) states that Borda satisfies monotonicity.</p>
<p><b>Sources:</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href='https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_3' target='_blank'>https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_3</a></li>
</ul>
</body></html>
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta charset='utf-8'><title>Borda – Neutral Reversal (citation)</title>
<style>
body, table, h1, h2, p, ul, li { font-family: Arial, sans-serif; }

h1 { margin-bottom: .2em; }
h2 { margin-top: 0; font-size: 1.1em; color: #444; }

a { color: #0066cc; text-decoration: none; }
a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }

ul { margin: 0.5em 0; padding-left: 2em; }
li { margin: 0.3em 0; }
</style>
</head><body><h1>Borda</h1>
<h2>Citation for Neutral Reversal</h2>
<p><b>Profile&nbsp;type:</b> Profile</p>
<p><b>Notes:</b></p>
<p>Saari (2003) notes that Borda satisfies neutral reversal.</p>
<p><b>Sources:</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href='https://doi.org/10.1086/342857' target='_blank'>https://doi.org/10.1086/342857</a></li>
</ul>
</body></html>
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta charset='utf-8'><title>Borda – Pareto Dominance Criterion (citation)</title>
<style>
body, table, h1, h2, p, ul, li { font-family: Arial, sans-serif; }

h1 { margin-bottom: .2em; }
h2 { margin-top: 0; font-size: 1.1em; color: #444; }

a { color: #0066cc; text-decoration: none; }
a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }

ul { margin: 0.5em 0; padding-left: 2em; }
li { margin: 0.3em 0; }
</style>
</head><body><h1>Borda</h1>
<h2>Citation for Pareto Dominance Criterion</h2>
<p><b>Profile&nbsp;type:</b> Profile</p>
<p><b>Notes:</b></p>
<p>Felsenthal (2012, Table 3.2) states that Borda satisfies Pareto dominance.</p>
<p><b>Sources:</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href='https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_3' target='_blank'>https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_3</a></li>
</ul>
</body></html>
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta charset='utf-8'><title>Borda – Reinforcement (citation)</title>
<style>
body, table, h1, h2, p, ul, li { font-family: Arial, sans-serif; }

h1 { margin-bottom: .2em; }
h2 { margin-top: 0; font-size: 1.1em; color: #444; }

a { color: #0066cc; text-decoration: none; }
a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }

ul { margin: 0.5em 0; padding-left: 2em; }
li { margin: 0.3em 0; }
</style>
</head><body><h1>Borda</h1>
<h2>Citation for Reinforcement</h2>
<p><b>Profile&nbsp;type:</b> Profile</p>
<p><b>Notes:</b></p>
<p>Young (1975) states that every scoring rule satisfies reinforcement (also called &#x27;consistency&#x27;). Borda is a scoring rule; hence it satisfies reinforcement.</p>
<p><b>Sources:</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href='http://www.jstor.org/stable/2100365' target='_blank'>http://www.jstor.org/stable/2100365</a></li>
</ul>
</body></html>
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta charset='utf-8'><title>Borda – Weak Positive Responsiveness (citation)</title>
<style>
body, table, h1, h2, p, ul, li { font-family: Arial, sans-serif; }

h1 { margin-bottom: .2em; }
h2 { margin-top: 0; font-size: 1.1em; color: #444; }

a { color: #0066cc; text-decoration: none; }
a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }

ul { margin: 0.5em 0; padding-left: 2em; }
li { margin: 0.3em 0; }
</style>
</head><body><h1>Borda</h1>
<h2>Citation for Weak Positive Responsiveness</h2>
<p><b>Profile&nbsp;type:</b> Profile</p>
<p><b>Notes:</b></p>
<p>Holliday and Pacuit (2025) note that all proper scoring rules (in the sense of Zwicker 2016, Def. 2.9) satisfy weak positive responsiveness. As a positional scoring rule, this covers the method.</p>
<p><b>Sources:</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href='https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00355-025-01598-7' target='_blank'>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00355-025-01598-7</a></li>
<li><a href='https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.14256' target='_blank'>https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.14256</a></li>
</ul>
</body></html>
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><meta charset='utf-8'><title>Bucklin – Monotonicity (citation)</title>
<style>
body, table, h1, h2, p, ul, li { font-family: Arial, sans-serif; }

h1 { margin-bottom: .2em; }
h2 { margin-top: 0; font-size: 1.1em; color: #444; }

a { color: #0066cc; text-decoration: none; }
a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }

ul { margin: 0.5em 0; padding-left: 2em; }
li { margin: 0.3em 0; }
</style>
</head><body><h1>Bucklin</h1>
<h2>Citation for Monotonicity</h2>
<p><b>Profile&nbsp;type:</b> Profile</p>
<p><b>Notes:</b></p>
<p>Felsenthal (2012, Table 3.2) states that Bucklin satisfies monotonicity.</p>
<p><b>Sources:</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href='https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_3' target='_blank'>https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_3</a></li>
</ul>
</body></html>
Loading