Skip to content

chore[cuda]: add date32 exporter test#6345

Merged
a10y merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
aduffy/temporal-export
Feb 6, 2026
Merged

chore[cuda]: add date32 exporter test#6345
a10y merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
aduffy/temporal-export

Conversation

@a10y
Copy link
Contributor

@a10y a10y commented Feb 6, 2026

last one needed for full TPCH type coverage

@a10y a10y added the changelog/feature A new feature label Feb 6, 2026
@a10y a10y force-pushed the aduffy/temporal-export branch from ed8b894 to c158f9d Compare February 6, 2026 18:53
@a10y a10y changed the title feat[cuda]: export for temporal types chore[cuda]: add date32 exporter test Feb 6, 2026
@a10y a10y force-pushed the aduffy/temporal-export branch from c158f9d to 43b2d22 Compare February 6, 2026 18:54
Signed-off-by: Andrew Duffy <andrew@a10y.dev>
@a10y a10y force-pushed the aduffy/temporal-export branch from 43b2d22 to 986cd97 Compare February 6, 2026 18:55
@a10y a10y marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2026 18:56
@a10y a10y enabled auto-merge (squash) February 6, 2026 18:57
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 6, 2026

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 22.63%

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 1136 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1265 skipped benchmarks1

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation chunked_bool_into_canonical[(1000, 10)] 65.8 µs 85.1 µs -22.63%
Simulation true_count_arrow_buffer[128] 946.9 ns 859.4 ns +10.18%

Comparing aduffy/temporal-export (986cd97) with develop (e061c55)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 1265 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@a10y a10y merged commit 6b8fb88 into develop Feb 6, 2026
46 of 48 checks passed
@a10y a10y deleted the aduffy/temporal-export branch February 6, 2026 19:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/feature A new feature

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants