add missing tests

[viseshrp]

Pull Request

Fixes #

Proposed Changes

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @viseshrp, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the test suite for the workedon application by adding a large number of new unit and integration tests. The changes aim to improve the overall stability and reliability of the codebase by covering previously untested functionalities across the CLI, configuration, data models, input parsing, and utility functions. This comprehensive testing effort will help prevent regressions and ensure the application behaves as expected under various conditions.

Highlights

• Expanded CLI Test Coverage: Added new tests to tests/test_cli.py covering subcommand execution, fetching the most recent entries, filtering entries older than a week, listing saved tags, and handling duration parsing, including overrides and invalid inputs.
• New Test Modules: Introduced several new test files to provide comprehensive coverage for various components: test_cli_branches.py, test_conf.py, test_constants.py, test_default_settings.py, test_exceptions.py, test_integration.py, test_models.py, test_models_edge_cases.py, test_parser.py, test_parser_edge_cases.py, test_utils.py, test_utils_edge_cases.py, test_version_main.py, and test_workedon.py.
• Integration Tests: A new tests/test_integration.py file was added to cover full application workflows, including saving, modifying, fetching, and deleting work entries, as well as testing multiple tag filtering, timezone changes with duration, pagination, and complex datetime parsing.
• Database and Parser Edge Cases: Dedicated test files (test_models_edge_cases.py and test_parser_edge_cases.py) were added to specifically address and validate edge case scenarios for database interactions and input parsing, ensuring robustness against unusual inputs and data states.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR adds comprehensive test coverage for the workedon package by introducing multiple new test files covering core functionality, edge cases, and integration scenarios.

Key Changes:

• Added unit tests for core modules including parser, models, configuration, utilities, and CLI
• Introduced edge case testing for parser datetime handling, duration parsing, and tag operations
• Added integration tests covering complete workflows with save, fetch, modify, and delete operations

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 15 out of 15 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
tests/test_workedon.py	Tests for core workedon module functions including work generation, prefetching, date ranges, and error handling
tests/test_version_main.py	Tests for package version handling and main module invocation
tests/test_utils_edge_cases.py	Edge case tests for utility functions including hash generation, timezone handling, and datetime conversion
tests/test_utils.py	Core utility function tests including settings loading, option decoration, and datetime operations
tests/test_parser_edge_cases.py	Extensive edge case testing for input parser covering datetime, duration, and tag parsing
tests/test_parser.py	Basic parser functionality tests for datetime, duration, and work text cleaning
tests/test_models_edge_cases.py	Edge case tests for database models including constraints, cascading, and special characters
tests/test_models.py	Core database model tests including migrations, schema creation, and model operations
tests/test_integration.py	Integration tests covering complete user workflows and multi-step operations
tests/test_exceptions.py	Tests for all custom exception types and their string representations
tests/test_default_settings.py	Validation tests for default settings values
tests/test_constants.py	Tests verifying expected values of application constants
tests/test_conf.py	Tests for settings configuration, file creation, and user settings merging
tests/test_cli_branches.py	Tests for CLI module edge cases including debug mode and callback execution
tests/test_cli.py	Enhanced CLI tests including new test cases for subcommands, duration handling, and tag listing

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 92.30769% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 98.9%. Comparing base (c184028) to head (eabaea1).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
workedon/workedon.py	90.9%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##            main     #85      +/-   ##
========================================
+ Coverage   86.2%   98.9%   +12.6%     
========================================
  Files         11      11              
  Lines        544     547       +3     
  Branches      86      86              
========================================
+ Hits         469     541      +72     
+ Misses        56       2      -54     
+ Partials      19       4      -15     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request adds a comprehensive suite of tests, significantly improving the project's test coverage. The new tests cover CLI interactions, configuration, models, data parsing, and utility functions, including many important edge cases. The overall quality of the tests is high. I've provided a few suggestions to improve the clarity, determinism, and correctness of some test cases to make the test suite even more robust and maintainable.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 15 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[Copilot]

Removing the conditional check if start and end: makes the date range filter unconditional. However, _get_date_range can return datetime objects even when no date parameters are provided (it defaults to past week). This change is likely intentional, but if start or end could ever be None in edge cases not covered by _get_date_range, this would cause a runtime error. Verify that _get_date_range always returns valid datetime objects.

[viseshrp]

@copilot _get_date_range always returns tuple[datetime.datetime, datetime.datetime]—there’s no path that returns None. Every branch ends up assigning start and end (with defaults, parsed values, or via the final else), then it raises if start > end and finally converts both to the internal timezone before returning. So the function itself never produces (None, None); any call site that assumed it might is covering dead code.

[viseshrp]

@gemini-code-assist
review thoroughly and comment next to each newly added/changed test

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request significantly improves the project's test coverage by adding a comprehensive suite of unit, integration, and edge-case tests for various components, including the CLI, parser, models, and configuration. The changes also include a valuable refactoring in tests/conftest.py to make tests more deterministic. I've identified a couple of areas for improvement: one is to disallow empty tags, a minor logic issue revealed by a new test, and the other is to enhance the clarity of a test name in test_utils.py. Overall, this is an excellent contribution that boosts the project's quality and maintainability.

[Copilot]

@viseshrp I've opened a new pull request, #92, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you.