Skip to content

Conversation

@benmelz
Copy link
Member

@benmelz benmelz commented Nov 10, 2025

@werebus I'm not sure how much this overlaps with what you're working on/if this is duplicated effort but this is what was sitting on my machine locally

Copy link
Member

@werebus werebus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So, I have some potential differences, but I think it makes sense to approve this as-is and then make those suggestions as an additional PR or two.

@werebus
Copy link
Member

werebus commented Nov 17, 2025

@benmelz would you prefer PRs against this branch or to merge it first and have PRs against main?

@benmelz
Copy link
Member Author

benmelz commented Nov 17, 2025

I guess merged into this branch first would be a cleaner history on main, but I don't really mind either way.

i.e. You can take ownership and merge this first if you'd like

@benmelz benmelz marked this pull request as ready for review November 17, 2025 19:00
@werebus werebus mentioned this pull request Nov 17, 2025
We probably _can_ use GHCR, But Kamal 2.8 adds support for a "local"
registry, which should be adequate until we need access to these
container images for anything other than deploy.
Technically, you can run Kamal from elsewhere and specify `-c <config
file>`.
I _do_ think deploy via Jenkins is the way to go eventually. But an MVP
can just be deploying more-or-less the way we do with Capistrano.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants