Skip to content

Conversation

@typelevel-steward
Copy link
Contributor

About this PR

πŸ“¦ Updates org.scalatest:scalatest from 3.2.14 to 3.2.17

Usage

βœ… Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

βš™ Adjust future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "org.scalatest", artifactId = "scalatest" } ]

Or, add this to slow down future updates of this dependency:

dependencyOverrides = [{
  pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
  dependency = { groupId = "org.scalatest", artifactId = "scalatest" }
}]
labels: library-update, early-semver-patch, semver-spec-patch, commit-count:1

This was referenced Sep 7, 2023
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (1043ccd) 90.60% compared to head (68d3568) 90.60%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #559   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.60%   90.60%           
=======================================
  Files          18       18           
  Lines         298      298           
  Branches        2        2           
=======================================
  Hits          270      270           
  Misses         28       28           

β˜” View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
πŸ“’ Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@typelevel-steward
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by #582.

@typelevel-steward typelevel-steward bot closed this Feb 7, 2024
@typelevel-steward typelevel-steward bot deleted the update/scalatest-3.2.17 branch February 7, 2024 16:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants