[pull] master from git:master#172
Merged
pull[bot] merged 18 commits intoturkdevops:masterfrom Mar 4, 2026
Merged
Conversation
When using the interactive add, reset, stash or checkout machinery, we do not have the option of reworking with a file when selecting hunks, because the session automatically advances to the next file or ends if we have just one file. Introduce the flag `--auto-advance` which auto advances by default, when interactively selecting patches with the '--patch' option. However, the `--no-auto-advance` option does not auto advance, thereby allowing users the option to rework with files. Signed-off-by: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The function `patch_update_file()` takes the add_p_state struct pointer and the current `struct file_diff` pointer and returns an int. When using the `--no-auto-advance` flag, we want to be able to request the next or previous file from the caller. Modify the function signature to instead take the index of the current `file_diff` and the `add_p_state` struct pointer so that we can compute the `file_diff` from the index while also having access to the file index. This will help us request the next or previous file from the caller. Signed-off-by: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the flag `--no-auto-advance` is used with `--patch`, if the user has decided `USE` on a hunk in a file, goes to another file, and then returns to this file and changes the previous decision on the hunk to `SKIP`, because the patch has already been applied, the last decision is not registered and the now SKIPPED hunk is still applied. Move the logic for applying patches into a function so that we can reuse this logic to implement the all or non application of the patches after the user is done with the hunk selection. Signed-off-by: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After deciding on all hunks in a file, the interactive session advances automatically to the next file if there is another, or the process ends. Now using the `--no-auto-advance` flag with `--patch`, the process does not advance automatically. A user can choose to go to the next file by pressing '>' or the previous file by pressing '<', before or after deciding on all hunks in the current file. After all hunks have been decided in a file, the user can still rework with the file by applying the options available in the permit set for that hunk, and after all the decisions, the user presses 'q' to submit. After all hunks have been decided, the user can press '?' which will show the hunk selection summary in the help patch remainder text including the total hunks, number of hunks marked for use and number of hunks marked for skip. This feature is enabled by passing the `--no-auto-advance` flag to `--patch` option of the subcommands add, stash, reset, and checkout. Signed-off-by: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Patch series e7b0737 (Merge branch 'rs/subtree-fixes', 2018-10-26) corrects several defects in `git subtree split`. The defects affect `split --rejoin` and merge commit processing. There is no test coverage for this, and e7b0737 did not introduce any. Convert the minimum working example [1] from the original patch submission [2] into test cases. [1]: https://gist.github.com/FoxFireX/1b794384612b7fd5e7cd157cff96269e [2]: <20180928183540.48968-1-roger.strain@swri.org> Signed-off-by: Colin Stagner <ask+git@howdoi.land> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add history depth checks to some of the subtree unit tests. These checks were previously introduced as part of 28a7e27 (contrib/subtree: detect rewritten subtree commits, 2026-01-09), which has since been reverted. Signed-off-by: Colin Stagner <ask+git@howdoi.land> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
`should_ignore_subtree_split_commit` detects subtrees which are outside of the current path --prefix and ignores them. This can speed up splits of repositories that have many subtrees. Since its inception [1], every iteration of this logic [2], [3] incorrectly excludes commits. This alters the split history. The split history and its commit hashes are API contract, so this is not permissible. While a commit from a different subtree may look like it doesn't contribute anything to a split, sometimes it does. Merge commits are a particular hot spot. For these, the pruning logic in `copy_or_skip` performs: 1. a check for "treesame" parents 2. two different common ancestry checks These checks operate on the **split history**, not the input history. The split history omits commits that do not affect the --prefix. This can significantly alter the ancestry of a merge. In order to determine if `copy_or_skip` will skip a merge, it is likely necessary to compute all the split history... which is what `should_ignore_subtree_split_commit` tries to avoid. To make this logic API-preserving, we could gate it behind a new CLI argument. The present implementation is actually a speed penalty in many cases, however, so this is not done here. Remove the `should_ignore_subtree_split_commit` logic. This fixes the regression reported in [4]. [1]: 98ba49c (subtree: fix split processing with multiple subtrees present, 2023-12-01) [2]: 83f9dad (contrib/subtree: fix split with squashed subtrees, 2025-09-09) [3]: 28a7e27 (contrib/subtree: detect rewritten subtree commits, 2026-01-09) [4]: <20251230170719.845029-1-george@mail.dietrich.pub> Reported-by: George <george@mail.dietrich.pub> Reported-by: Christian Heusel <christian@heusel.eu> Signed-off-by: Colin Stagner <ask+git@howdoi.land> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Replace 'test -f' with the helper function 'test_path_is_file' to provide better error messages upon failure. Signed-off-by: Lambert Duclos-de Guise <lambertddg@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Extract skip_slashes() to avoid repeating the same is_dir_sep() loop in multiple places inside normalize_path_copy_len(). Keep the dot-component handling inline to preserve the original control flow and readability, as suggested in review. No functional changes. Behavior verified with t0060-path-utils.sh. Signed-off-by: Pushkar Singh <pushkarkumarsingh1970@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In add_pack(), we allocate l.remaining_objects with llist_init() before calling open_pack_index(). If open_pack_index() fails we return NULL without freeing the allocated list, leaking the memory. Fix by calling llist_free(l.remaining_objects) on the error path before returning. Signed-off-by: Sahitya Chandra <sahityajb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After we have freed the file pair, we should set the queue reference to null. When computing a diff in a partial clone, there is a chance that we could trigger a prefetch of missing objects when there are freed entries in the global diff queue due to break-rewrites detection. The segfault only occurs if an entry has been freed by break-rewrites and there is an entry to be prefetched. There is a new test in t4067 that trigger the segmentation fault that results in this case. The test explicitly fetch the necessary blobs to trigger the break rewrites, some blobs are left to be prefetched. The fix is to set the queue pointer to NULL after it is freed, the prefetch will skip NULL entries. Signed-off-by: Han Young <hanyang.tony@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An earlier attempt to optimize "git subtree" discarded too much relevant histories, which has been corrected. * cs/subtree-split-fixes: contrib/subtree: process out-of-prefix subtrees contrib/subtree: test history depth contrib/subtree: capture additional test-cases
Leakfix. * sc/pack-redundant-leakfix: pack-redundant: fix memory leak when open_pack_index() fails
Code clean-up. * ps/simplify-normalize-path-copy-len: path: factor out skip_slashes() in normalize_path_copy_len()
Test code clean-up. * lg/t2004-test-path-is-helpers: t2004: use test_path_is_file instead of test -f
"git add -p" learned a new mode that allows the user to revisit a file that was already dealt with. * aa/add-p-no-auto-advance: add-patch: allow interfile navigation when selecting hunks add-patch: allow all-or-none application of patches add-patch: modify patch_update_file() signature interactive -p: add new `--auto-advance` flag
A prefetch call can be triggered to access a stale diff_queue entry after diffcore-break breaks a filepair into two and freed the original entry that is no longer used, leading to a segfault, which has been corrected. * hy/diff-lazy-fetch-with-break-fix: diffcore-break: avoid segfault with freed entries
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See Commits and Changes for more details.
Created by
pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.4)
Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )