Skip to content

Conversation

@benjeffery
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (8eff793) to head (d0ac402).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #169   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            8         8           
  Lines          351       352    +1     
  Branches        43        43           
=========================================
+ Hits           351       352    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jeromekelleher
Copy link
Member

Does this make any difference?

@daikitag
Copy link
Collaborator

@jeromekelleher The computational speed of tstrait with biobank-scale dataset on the HPC cluster is very slow (the job won't complete after days even though the original code completed in around 10-12 hours) after incorporating the changes in 7ab3653, and I'm now working with @benjeffery to try finding out the issues behind that. I'll let you know if there are any updates on this.

@benjeffery
Copy link
Member Author

Does this make any difference?

About 50% runtime reduction in my (admitedly small-scale) testing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants