Skip to content

fix(ci): fix for code scanning alert related to permissions#127

Merged
tsinis merged 1 commit intomainfrom
ci/alert-autofix
Mar 22, 2026
Merged

fix(ci): fix for code scanning alert related to permissions#127
tsinis merged 1 commit intomainfrom
ci/alert-autofix

Conversation

@tsinis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@tsinis tsinis commented Mar 19, 2026

Potential fix for https://github.com/tsinis/functional_status_codes/security/code-scanning/3

In general, the fix is to explicitly declare a minimal permissions block for the affected job (or at the workflow root) so that GITHUB_TOKEN does not inherit broad repository defaults. For this specific case, we only need read access to repository contents for actions/checkout to function; the rest of the steps run purely locally. Therefore, we can add permissions: contents: read to the publish-dry-run job.

Concretely, in .github/workflows/publish.yaml, under the publish-dry-run job definition (around line 17), add a permissions section with contents: read. The other jobs already define their own permissions (check-version has contents: write, publish has id-token: write), so we should only modify publish-dry-run. No new methods, imports, or external definitions are needed; this is purely a YAML configuration change in the workflow.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 19, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@tsinis has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 40 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 93a7f9bc-ff57-441e-97a3-009eef204dc3

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bd55851 and 2add1aa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/publish.yaml
📝 Coding Plan
  • Generate coding plan for human review comments

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@tsinis tsinis marked this pull request as ready for review March 19, 2026 21:50
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ci/cd label Mar 19, 2026
@tsinis tsinis changed the title Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 3: Workflow does not contain permissions fix(ci): fix for code scanning alert related to permissions Mar 19, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot added bug Something isn't working D-3 labels Mar 19, 2026
@tsinis tsinis merged commit 3c1ee56 into main Mar 22, 2026
13 of 14 checks passed
@tsinis tsinis deleted the ci/alert-autofix branch March 22, 2026 08:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working ci/cd D-3

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant