Skip to content

Conversation

@vsenderov
Copy link
Member

With treeppl/treeppl#50 these lines should not be needed.

With treeppl/treeppl#50 these lines should not be needed.
@vsenderov
Copy link
Member Author

I've included this in my new PR #3 . This is obsolete if that PR gets merged.

@vsenderov vsenderov marked this pull request as draft February 12, 2024 13:40
@vsenderov vsenderov marked this pull request as ready for review February 27, 2024 14:31
@vsenderov
Copy link
Member Author

reactivated as #3 was binned

@vsenderov
Copy link
Member Author

I should close this I think

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant