Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I made some grammar/text improvements but the most striking changes are the addition of a getting started section and the storytelling of a ordinary case where a C-level wishes to see information on his/hers dashboards that the data analyst concludes is not present in the database itself.
Furthermore, I think the solution tooling should be made flexibl. The solution diagram already points out a pretty clear design the contestent can adhere to, but there are also solution requirements which are redundant if Airflow is used. Therefore, I changed the requirement statement to
must use a combination of the tools described..., as to imply at least one tool should be used and also added explicit statement the contestent can design his/hers own solution., but it is encouraged to use the provided design.