fix: wait for window creation no matter if on main thread#15508
Merged
Legend-Master merged 5 commits intoJul 4, 2026
Conversation
Contributor
Package Changes Through 6d94b94There are 6 changes which include tauri-utils with patch, tauri-runtime-wry with patch, tauri with patch, tauri-bundler with patch, tauri-cli with patch, @tauri-apps/cli with patch Planned Package VersionsThe following package releases are the planned based on the context of changes in this pull request.
Add another change file through the GitHub UI by following this link. Read about change files or the docs at github.com/jbolda/covector |
Contributor
Author
|
@lucasfernog I'll wait a bit for your review before merging since you might know the history better |
amrbashir
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #10157
Closes #13046
Closes #14914
Closes #14915
Reference: #10157 (comment)
#14915 did this with the same approach, but the use of LLM made tons of noise, that it covered up what the change was really about...
For reviewer: I don't know if this was a mistake not to do this or there's a legitimate reason for that