-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
(closes #2884) Allow WHERE with imported symbols by changing Ref2ArrayRange behaviour to do the validations #3260
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3260 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 99.91% 99.91% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 376 376
Lines 53529 53522 -7
==========================================
- Hits 53484 53475 -9
- Misses 45 47 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
@arporter @LonelyCat124 This is ready for review. It changes the Reference2ArrayReference to fail if the outcome cannot be guaranteed, so thing like WHERE can rely on its validation. This will be followed by #1858 (structures) and #2722 (dependencies), which can be done in a single location after this PR, but it was to big to do here. |
arporter
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really nice Sergi, it's good to see the simplification that this has achieved.
I'm worried that we are no longer raising an exception when we see a StructureReference - given that we can't handle them this needs to be flagged?
Apart from that, it's just minor tidying. I'll run the integration tests next time (or you could fire them off perhaps once you're done).
| an Array) to a PSyIR Range. For example: | ||
| ''' | ||
| Transformation to convert plain References of array symbols to | ||
| ArrayReferances with full-extend ranges if it is semantically equivalent |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
s/extend/extent/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed
| to do so (e.g. it won't convert call arguments because it would change the | ||
| bounds values). | ||
| Note that if a node that does not need to be modified is provided (e.g. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"...if the provided node does not need..."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
| # TODO issue #1858. Add support for structures containing arrays. | ||
| if node and node.parent and isinstance(node.parent, Call): | ||
| if node.position == 0: | ||
| return |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment please - I didn't readily understand at first but presumably this is checking that the node isn't the Reference associated with the routine target of a Call?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Exactly. Added comment
| if node.parent.is_elemental is None: | ||
| raise TransformationError(LazyString( | ||
| lambda: f"The supplied node is passed as an argument to a " | ||
| f"Call that we don't know if it is elemental or not: " |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"...that may or may not be elemental: ...."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
| return | ||
|
|
||
| if ( | ||
| type(node) is ArrayReference or |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This probably needs a pylint disable for unidiomatic type check?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, done
| :type symbols: List[str] | ||
| :param scalars: list of symbol names that must be added to the symbol | ||
| table with an scalar datatype. | ||
| :type symbols: List[str] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please replace with typehints.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
| with pytest.raises(TransformationError) as info: | ||
| trans.validate(Reference(Symbol("x"))) | ||
| assert ("The supplied node should be a Reference to a symbol of known " | ||
| "type, but 'x' is not." in str(info.value)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It might be useful to include str(sym) in the error message so that we can see what PSyclone thinks 'x' is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good idea, done
| assert ("The supplied node should be a Reference but found " | ||
| "'ArrayReference'." in str(info.value)) | ||
|
|
||
| trans.validate(None) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Couldn't you have this as the first step in the previous test (i.e. before "If it is not even a Reference")?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh yes, it is already there, removing this one
| trans.validate(reference) | ||
| assert ("node is passed as an argument to a Call to a non-elemental " | ||
| "routine (DEALLOCATE(a)" in str(info.value)) | ||
| trans.validate(assign.lhs) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The docstring says we test that a StructureReference raises an exception but clearly it doesn't any longer. Given that we don't support them yet, I would argue we should raise an exception as we don't know what to do with them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It felt bad to have the comment that are not supported and then just return the validation.
The reason I did it is because both the WHERE and the ArrayAssignment2Loop already implement and have several tests for structure references (which they happily take at face-value, without checking if they need to be added ranges).
Adding this restriction here, without implementing proper support for letting valid cases pass, and array types extended, makes all of those fail.
Also this is not worse than master, in master it had an exception but it was "except:pass" everywhere it was used.
I suggest I tackle this in a follow up (I attempted starting it but it quickly grows very large), or we can block this for now. Let me know what you prefer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I implemented it in #3266
| trans.validate(assign.lhs) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def test_validate_pointer_assignment(fortran_reader): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We probably don't need this test anymore?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added the check back (it was important for NEMOv4 performance because tmask is a pointer) and the check is more precise. So I kept (and extended the test).
99ab3e0 to
3e1c6b8
Compare
|
@arporter This is ready for another look, I just fired the integration test. |
Change Ref2ArrayRange behaviour by letting it pass if the provided node is already in the expanded form, but making it fail if for a expression we cannot guarantee if it could be expanded or not. This will bring validations that now need to be done every time its used to inside the transformation.