Skip to content

Conversation

@LonelyCat124
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@LonelyCat124 LonelyCat124 changed the title (3060 reference accesses (Closes #3060) reference accesses for intrinsicCall Sep 8, 2025
@LonelyCat124
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Follow-on to #3119

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 8, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 99.63235% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 99.89%. Comparing base (769cf00) to head (9335f5e).
⚠️ Report is 84 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/psyclone/lfric.py 75.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3125      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.90%   99.89%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         374      374              
  Lines       52383    52714     +331     
==========================================
+ Hits        52332    52659     +327     
- Misses         51       55       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@LonelyCat124 LonelyCat124 added ready for review Blocked An issue/PR that is blocked by one or more issues/PRs. and removed in progress labels Sep 11, 2025
@LonelyCat124
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@sergisiso I have a first implementation of this now if you want to examine it if you have time. Its currently "blocked" by #3119 (which is in turn dependent on #3110 ) so there's very much no rush on this, especially if I do solve some other issues before we merge 3319.

@LonelyCat124
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Moved this up to date with latest master and #3119, so now its ready to be updated using argument names instead of any indices.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Blocked An issue/PR that is blocked by one or more issues/PRs. ready for review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants