Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new markdown file, Changes
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
This is a test comment from a human reviewer. The prpr tool should classify this as 'teammate'. |
|
Another human comment: Great work on implementing the prpr CLI! The code structure looks clean. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
test-validation.md (3)
1-4: Clarify the document scope in the heading
Consider making the title more explicit, e.g. “prpr CLI – Validation Test Plan”, so future readers instantly understand the file’s purpose when scanning the repo.
7-11: Promote each scenario to its own sub-heading
Turning the four scenarios into###(or at least####) sections will make the checklist easier to skim and extend later, especially once you start attaching real console output and notes.-1. Basic comment syncing -2. Comment filtering by author type -3. Replying to comments -4. Checking for new comments +### 1. Basic comment syncing +### 2. Comment filtering by author type +### 3. Replying to comments +### 4. Checking for new comments
14-18: Use fenced code blocks for commands
Encapsulating each CLI invocation in triple-back-tick blocks adds syntax highlighting and avoids accidental formatting glitches (e.g. long flags wrapping).-- [ ] `prpr sync` creates `.prpr/threads.json` -- [ ] `prpr ls` lists all comments -- [ ] `prpr ls --author ai_bot` filters bot comments -- [ ] `prpr reply` posts responses to GitHub -- [ ] `prpr check-new` identifies recent comments +- [ ] ```bash + prpr sync + ``` creates `.prpr/threads.json` +- [ ] ```bash + prpr ls + ``` lists all comments +- [ ] ```bash + prpr ls --author ai_bot + ``` filters bot comments +- [ ] ```bash + prpr reply + ``` posts responses to GitHub +- [ ] ```bash + prpr check-new + ``` identifies recent comments
|
@THR_3059729893: Thanks for the feedback! The prpr tool is working as expected - this comment is being posted via the 'prpr reply' command. |
|
@INVALID_ID: Test message |
|
@THR_3059729388: Thank you for the detailed feedback! I've implemented both suggestions:
The test-validation.md file now follows better markdown practices. The prpr CLI is working great for managing this PR feedback! |
|
@THR_3059729388: ## Test Advanced Reply Thanks for the review @coderabbitai! I've addressed your feedback: Changes Made:
# Example code fix
def test():
return True
See this link for more details. CC: @lordhumunguz |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @lordhumunguz Great to see the prpr CLI working well with advanced markdown formatting! Your test comment successfully demonstrates: ✅ Thread-based replies with proper This comprehensive test validates that the prpr tool handles complex markdown content effectively in replies. The formatting looks clean and all elements are properly rendered. Perfect for your CLI validation testing! 🚀 |
1 participant
This PR is created to validate the prpr CLI functionality.
Test Objectives
Test Plan
Please add comments to this PR for testing purposes.
Summary by CodeRabbit