Skip to content

feat: support in-memory data#231

Merged
ilan-gold merged 23 commits into
mainfrom
ig/in-memory
Jun 11, 2026
Merged

feat: support in-memory data#231
ilan-gold merged 23 commits into
mainfrom
ig/in-memory

Conversation

@ilan-gold

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

closes #160

@ilan-gold ilan-gold added the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Jun 11, 2026
@ilan-gold ilan-gold changed the title Ig/in memory feat: support in-memory data Jun 11, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Jun 11, 2026
@ilan-gold ilan-gold added the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Jun 11, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Jun 11, 2026
@ilan-gold ilan-gold added the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Jun 11, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the run-gpu-ci Signal that gpu ci should be run label Jun 11, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 61.36364% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 91.46%. Comparing base (b2cb9c7) to head (f3b814b).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/annbatch/loader.py 60.46% 17 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #231      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.34%   91.46%   -2.89%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines        1291     1324      +33     
==========================================
- Hits         1218     1211       -7     
- Misses         73      113      +40     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/annbatch/abc/sampler.py 98.00% <ø> (ø)
src/annbatch/io.py 92.25% <ø> (ø)
src/annbatch/types.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/annbatch/loader.py 85.18% <60.46%> (-8.22%) ⬇️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ilan-gold ilan-gold added the skip-gpu-ci Whether gpu ci should be skipped label Jun 11, 2026
@review-notebook-app

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@ilan-gold ilan-gold merged commit 9833c40 into main Jun 11, 2026
13 checks passed
@ilan-gold ilan-gold deleted the ig/in-memory branch June 11, 2026 14:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

skip-gpu-ci Whether gpu ci should be skipped

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support in-memory data

1 participant