Skip to content

CLDSRV-859: trigger scality-kms release workflow on cloudserver release#6089

Open
tcarmet wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopment/9.2from
feature/CLDSRV-859-trigger-scality-kms
Open

CLDSRV-859: trigger scality-kms release workflow on cloudserver release#6089
tcarmet wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopment/9.2from
feature/CLDSRV-859-trigger-scality-kms

Conversation

@tcarmet
Copy link
Contributor

@tcarmet tcarmet commented Feb 26, 2026

Summary

  • Add a new job to the release workflow that automatically triggers the scality-kms release workflow after a successful cloudserver release
  • Use GitHub App authentication to trigger the cross-repository workflow
  • Add repository owner check to prevent forks from attempting to trigger the workflow

This ensures the KMS server image is built with the latest cloudserver base image whenever a new cloudserver release is published.

Related to scality/scality-kms#79

Add a new job to the release workflow that triggers the scality-kms release
workflow after a successful cloudserver release. This ensures the KMS server
image is built with the latest cloudserver base image.
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Feb 26, 2026

Hello tcarmet,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Feb 26, 2026

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue CLDSRV-859 contains:

  • None

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 9.2.29

  • 9.3.5

  • 9.4.0

Please check the Fix Version/s of CLDSRV-859, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@tcarmet tcarmet requested a review from a team February 26, 2026 19:10
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 26, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.15%. Comparing base (9b836b8) to head (172ab3c).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph
see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/9.2    #6089      +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage            84.17%   84.15%   -0.03%     
===================================================
  Files                  204      204              
  Lines                13124    13124              
===================================================
- Hits                 11047    11044       -3     
- Misses                2077     2080       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
file-ft-tests 67.62% <ø> (ø)
kmip-ft-tests 28.19% <ø> (ø)
mongo-v0-ft-tests 68.84% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
mongo-v1-ft-tests 68.85% <ø> (ø)
multiple-backend 35.24% <ø> (ø)
sur-tests 35.75% <ø> (ø)
sur-tests-inflights 37.60% <ø> (ø)
unit 69.71% <ø> (ø)
utapi-v2-tests 34.50% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@tcarmet tcarmet requested a review from a team February 27, 2026 17:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants