Skip to content

Bump OpenTelemetry dependencies to latest (0.219.0 / core 2.8.0)#2649

Merged
bert-e merged 2 commits into
development/8.4from
improvement/ARSN-598/bump-opentelemetry-deps
Jun 22, 2026
Merged

Bump OpenTelemetry dependencies to latest (0.219.0 / core 2.8.0)#2649
bert-e merged 2 commits into
development/8.4from
improvement/ARSN-598/bump-opentelemetry-deps

Conversation

@delthas

@delthas delthas commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What

Bump arsenal's OpenTelemetry dependencies to the latest published versions, in two commits:

  1. Bump the OTEL suite — every @opentelemetry/* dep now resolves to a single latest version (no duplicates):
    • @opentelemetry/sdk-node, @opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http: ^0.218.0^0.219.0
    • @opentelemetry/resources, @opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base, @opentelemetry/context-async-hooks, @opentelemetry/core: ^2.7.1^2.8.0
    • @opentelemetry/api: ^1.9.0^1.9.1 (also dedupes the lone api@1.9.0 that prom-client left in the lockfile)
  2. Bump the package version 8.4.98.4.10

Why

The 0.218.0 OTEL suite transitively pins @opentelemetry/core@2.7.1, which carries GHSA-8988-4f7v-96qf (moderate — unbounded memory allocation in W3C Baggage propagation, patched in 2.8.0). sdk-node@0.219.0 pins core@2.8.0, so the vulnerable 2.7.1 is removed from the dependency tree entirely (no version skew).

This unblocks cloudserver's dependency-review CI, which fails on the transitive core@2.7.1 once arsenal is bumped (CLDSRV-928 / scality/cloudserver#6192).

Supersedes the partial dependabot bump (dependabot/npm_and_yarn/opentelemetry/core-2.8.0), which bumps only the direct core devDependency and leaves core@2.7.1 reachable through sdk-node@0.218.0.

Issue: ARSN-598

@bert-e

bert-e commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello delthas,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e

bert-e commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

@delthas delthas force-pushed the improvement/ARSN-598/bump-opentelemetry-deps branch from 55a78a8 to 475a8e4 Compare June 18, 2026 12:36
@claude

claude Bot commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

LGTM

Review by Claude Code

@delthas delthas requested review from a team, benzekrimaha and maeldonn June 18, 2026 12:37
@scality scality deleted a comment from claude Bot Jun 18, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 74.30%. Comparing base (2366010) to head (d415b43).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/8.4    #2649      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            74.27%   74.30%   +0.02%     
===================================================
  Files                  229      229              
  Lines                18646    18646              
  Branches              3884     3884              
===================================================
+ Hits                 13849    13854       +5     
+ Misses                4792     4787       -5     
  Partials                 5        5              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jun 21, 2026
delthas added 2 commits June 22, 2026 09:50
sdk-node 0.219.0 pins @opentelemetry/core 2.8.0, dropping the vulnerable 2.7.1 (GHSA-8988-4f7v-96qf, unbounded memory allocation in W3C Baggage propagation) from the dependency tree. Also move @opentelemetry/api to ^1.9.1 (latest) and dedupe the lone api 1.9.0 left by prom-client, so the whole OTEL tree resolves to a single latest version.

Issue: ARSN-598
@delthas delthas force-pushed the improvement/ARSN-598/bump-opentelemetry-deps branch from 475a8e4 to d415b43 Compare June 22, 2026 07:53
@bert-e

bert-e commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jun 22, 2026
@delthas delthas requested review from a team and SylvainSenechal June 22, 2026 07:56
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jun 22, 2026
@delthas

delthas commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/approve

@bert-e

bert-e commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

@bert-e

bert-e commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Integration data created

I have created the integration data for the additional destination branches.

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/6.4
  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.1
  • development/8.2
  • development/8.3

You can set option create_pull_requests if you need me to create
integration pull requests in addition to integration branches, with:

@bert-e create_pull_requests

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e

bert-e commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/8.4

  • ✔️ development/8.5

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/6.4
  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.1
  • development/8.2
  • development/8.3

This pull request did not target the following hotfix branch(es) so they
were left untouched:

  • hotfix/7.9.0
  • hotfix/7.10.4
  • hotfix/7.10.46
  • hotfix/7.70.14
  • hotfix/7.10.57
  • hotfix/7.70.4
  • hotfix/7.8.0
  • hotfix/7.70.20
  • hotfix/7.10.29
  • hotfix/6.4.7
  • hotfix/7.4.7
  • hotfix/7.4.4
  • hotfix/7.2.0
  • hotfix/7.10.1
  • hotfix/7.4.2
  • hotfix/7.10.36
  • hotfix/7.4.5
  • hotfix/7.4.1
  • hotfix/7.10.31
  • hotfix/7.4.0
  • hotfix/7.70.25
  • hotfix/7.4.8
  • hotfix/7.6.0
  • hotfix/7.7.0
  • hotfix/7.5.0
  • hotfix/7.10.47
  • hotfix/7.4.9
  • hotfix/7.10.3
  • hotfix/7.10.43
  • hotfix/7.10.2
  • hotfix/7.4.3
  • hotfix/7.4.10
  • hotfix/7.10.0
  • hotfix/7.4.6

Please check the status of the associated issue ARSN-598.

Goodbye delthas.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e bert-e merged commit d415b43 into development/8.4 Jun 22, 2026
15 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the improvement/ARSN-598/bump-opentelemetry-deps branch June 22, 2026 08:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants