Fix mixing of input and output io_implied_do rules#52
Open
dryabov wants to merge 1 commit intosatamas:mainfrom
Open
Fix mixing of input and output io_implied_do rules#52dryabov wants to merge 1 commit intosatamas:mainfrom
dryabov wants to merge 1 commit intosatamas:mainfrom
Conversation
Original code tries to parse `variable` from `input_item` prior to `expr` from `output_item` that results in issue with following code:
WRITE (99,*) (A(K)*B,K=1,3)
Changing the order of `input_item` and `output_item` in the `io_implied_do_object` is not a correct solution because it allows expressions in the READ statement.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Original code tries to parse
variablefrominput_itemprior toexprfromoutput_itemthat results in an issue with the following code:(Changing the order of
input_itemandoutput_itemin theio_implied_do_objectis not a correct solution because it allows expressions in the READ statement.)