Skip to content

Comments

[Snyk] Upgrade yargs from 17.1.0 to 17.1.1#2

Open
snyk-bot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-upgrade-8ecc9b12f4008ff568c0ea0d4c9fa817
Open

[Snyk] Upgrade yargs from 17.1.0 to 17.1.1#2
snyk-bot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-upgrade-8ecc9b12f4008ff568c0ea0d4c9fa817

Conversation

@snyk-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@snyk-bot snyk-bot commented Sep 4, 2021

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade yargs from 17.1.0 to 17.1.1.

merge advice
ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 2 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 21 days ago, on 2021-08-13.
Release notes
Package name: yargs
  • 17.1.1 - 2021-08-13

    Bug Fixes

    • positional array defaults should not be combined with provided values (#2006) (832222d)
  • 17.1.1-candidate.0 - 2021-08-13
  • 17.1.0 - 2021-08-04

    Features

    • update Levenshtein to Damerau-Levenshtein (#1973) (d2c121b)

    Bug Fixes

    • coerce middleware should be applied once (#1978) (14bd6be)
    • implies should not fail when implied key's value is 0, false or empty string (#1985) (8010472)
    • positionals should not overwrite options (#1992) (9d84309)
    • strict should fail unknown arguments (#1977) (c804f0d)
    • wrap(null) no longer causes strange indentation behavior (#1988) (e1871aa)
from yargs GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: yargs
  • 72e12b0 chore: v17.1.1 release
  • 8f77414 chore: release 17.1.1 (#2007)
  • 832222d fix: positional array defaults should not be combined with provided values (#2006)

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant