add advisory for pam-bindings#2771
Conversation
djc
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for reporting! Should address the lint issue.
I've asked the maintainers to confirm they're okay with an advisory in
2661a13 to
0f2af77
Compare
I'm having trouble with the crate name |
Huh, that's a little annoying. Can you file an issue against the rustsec/rustsec repo? |
0f2af77 to
ee630bf
Compare
ee630bf to
05d08f2
Compare
|
I've updated the advisory and commented out the affected function for now to unblock this @djc. Hopefully the pragmatic approach can be merged rustsec/rustsec#1575 (comment), but that shouldn't block alerting PAM module implementations to check whether they are affected. Thanksfully one module already implemented a workaround rado0x54/pam-ssh-agent-webauthn#14. |
Depeneds on: rustsec/rustsec#1582