Fix grammar and readability issues in README#861
Open
hunterhogan wants to merge 1 commit intorsms:masterfrom
Open
Fix grammar and readability issues in README#861hunterhogan wants to merge 1 commit intorsms:masterfrom
hunterhogan wants to merge 1 commit intorsms:masterfrom
Conversation
I didn't add an Oxford comma because the text only has one items-in-series clause, so maybe you omitted the comma on purpose. I only changed clear problems. I did not, for example, change inline Latin abbreviations (_i.e.,_ "_e.g._") to English. Nevertheless, every style guide I've read, including [_The Chicago Manual of Style_](https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org), suggests that style. I didn't lint the markdown, but I strongly recommend that you lint the syntax because there are multiple issues.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I didn't add an Oxford comma because the text only has one items-in-series clause, so maybe you omitted the comma on purpose.
I only changed clear problems. I did not, for example, change inline Latin abbreviations (i.e., "e.g.") to English. Nevertheless, every style guide I've read, including The Chicago Manual of Style, suggests that style.
I didn't lint the markdown, but I strongly recommend that you lint the syntax because there are multiple issues.