Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 2: Workflow does not contain permissions#12
Merged
rossaddison merged 1 commit intomasterfrom Dec 20, 2025
Merged
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 2: Workflow does not contain permissions#12rossaddison merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
rossaddison merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
…n permissions Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Potential fix for https://github.com/rossaddison/data-cycle/security/code-scanning/2
In general, this problem is fixed by explicitly adding a
permissionsblock to the workflow (at the root level or per job) to restrict theGITHUB_TOKENto the least privileges required. For read-only CI checks (like composer-require-checker) that do not need to modify repository resources,contents: readis typically sufficient; in many cases you can even setpermissions: read-allorpermissions: {}(no permissions) if the checks don’t use the token at all.For this specific workflow, the best minimal change without altering functionality is to add a root-level
permissionssection just after thename:field. Composer require checking normally only needs to read the repository to install dependencies and run analysis, and does not need to write to issues, PRs, or the contents API, so we can safely setcontents: read. This root-level block will apply to thecomposer-require-checkerjob, since it has no job-specific permissions. No additional methods, imports, or definitions are needed because this is a pure YAML configuration change in.github/workflows/composer-require-checker.yml.Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.