Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 4: Workflow does not contain permissions#10
Merged
rossaddison merged 1 commit intomasterfrom Dec 20, 2025
Merged
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 4: Workflow does not contain permissions#10rossaddison merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
rossaddison merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
…n permissions Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Potential fix for https://github.com/rossaddison/data-cycle/security/code-scanning/4
In general, the fix is to explicitly declare a
permissionsblock in the workflow so that theGITHUB_TOKENonly has the minimal access required. Since this workflow’s only job delegates entirely to a reusable workflow that runs tests (mutation testing), it typically needs to read the repository contents and metadata but not to push changes. Therefore, settingcontents: readat the workflow level is a safe, minimal baseline; if the reusable workflow requires additional scopes (for example,checks: writeorpull-requests: write), those could be added explicitly, but we should not guess extra write scopes from this snippet.The best way to fix this without changing behavior is to add a top-level
permissions:block after thename:declaration (or beforeon:if you prefer), applying to all jobs that do not override it. We will setcontents: read, which is sufficient for most CI/test workflows and aligns with GitHub’s recommended minimal starting point. No imports or additional definitions are needed because this is a YAML configuration change only. Concretely, in.github/workflows/mutation.yml, add:at the top workflow level, e.g., between
name: mutation testandjobs:.Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.