security-context -> enclave

[mikaelarguedas]

Signed-off-by: Mikael Arguedas mikael.arguedas@gmail.com

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #198 into master will not change coverage by %.
The diff coverage is 80.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #198   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   60.00%   60.00%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines         565      565           
  Branches       52       52           
=======================================
  Hits          339      339           
  Misses        212      212           
  Partials       14       14           

Flag	Coverage Δ
#unittests	60.00% <80.00%> (ø)

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
sros2/sros2/api/_artifact_generation.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
sros2/sros2/verb/generate_artifacts.py	0.00% <ø> (ø)
sros2/sros2/api/_policy.py	85.71% <66.66%> (ø)
sros2/sros2/api/_key.py	90.14% <100.00%> (ø)
sros2/sros2/api/_keystore.py	84.72% <100.00%> (ø)
sros2/sros2/api/_permission.py	92.30% <100.00%> (ø)
sros2/sros2/verb/create_key.py	80.00% <100.00%> (ø)
sros2/sros2/verb/create_permission.py	68.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4ea3858...b4d7709. Read the comment docs.

[mikaelarguedas]

CI for this and connected PRs:

ros2/rcl#612
ros2/rmw#211
ros2/rmw_connext#407
ros2/rmw_cyclonedds#146
ros2/rmw_dds_common#13
ros2/rmw_implementation#91
ros2/rmw_fastrtps#365
#198
ros2/system_tests#414

Repos file at https://gist.githubusercontent.com/mikaelarguedas/cd1009797d836e6d46a0f6d12b1cc05d/raw/2770591673f28d73d21ea5d432d939fee171e75d/enclaves.repos

• Linux
• Linux-aarch64
• macOS
• Windows

@ivanpauno AFAICT all these test failures are also present in the nightly jobs. Please let me know if you know of any that may have been borken by this set of PRs

[ivanpauno]

LGTM!

[ivanpauno]

@ivanpauno AFAICT all these test failures are also present in the nightly jobs. Please let me know if you know of any that may have been borken by this set of PRs

Please, run windows job again only with one rmw implementation.
We have recently got rid of Poco and something seems to be broken now.

The other platforms looks ok.

[mikaelarguedas]

Please, run windows job again only with one rmw implementation.
We have recently got rid of Poco and something seems to be broken now.

gotcha

Connext only, using updated rcl after resolving merge conflicts

• Windows

[ruffsl]

Check for all case and plur varenents like Contexts -> Enclaves

[kyrofa]

Mostly good, although found one issue with the sedding.

[mikaelarguedas]

Another round of CI after rebasing all PRs
CI only with connext to avoid Windows build failure
Build and testing only rcl and sros2

• Linux (cmake warning unrelated)
• macOS (cmake warning unrelated)
• Windows
• Windows existing failures on master (without these PRs):

[mikaelarguedas]

Looks like windows rcl is broken... seems unrelated to this set of PRs though.
rcl master build to compare:
@ivanpauno can we go ahead and merge all these renaming PRs? or do you want to wait for the windows issue on master to be fixed first?

comments addressed

[ruffsl]

Just skimming the test results from , it seems that test_rcl_get_node_names_with_security_contexts failed, but wasn't that renamed using enclave here:
https://github.com/ros2/rcl/pull/612/files#diff-6dd792d0229de5c8296858ba7649a6d3R168

Is the job using all the latest commits in the PR?

[mikaelarguedas]

That job is running on master to show that all rcl tests on master are broken. It doesn't include any change from these PRs.

Updated #198 (comment) to make it clearer

[ivanpauno]

CI looks good.
If I'm not missing something, everything is being renamed well.