Language feature: named arguments in function calls

[TwitchBronBron]

Initial proposal for named arguments in function calls.

[livecano]

Is it possible to omit a name if maybe prefix with an underscore?

[neilsb]

Sorry for the delay in looking at this - was away on vacation.

This all looks great and seems comprehensive. Personally not keen "Named arguments after ordered parameters", as for clarity I would argue they should either all be named, or none (all be left in the default order) - however may well not be everyone's thinking. :)

[TwitchBronBron]

Sorry for the delay in looking at this - was away on vacation.

This all looks great and seems comprehensive. Personally not keen "Named arguments after ordered parameters", as for clarity I would argue they should either all be named, or none (all be left in the default order) - however may well not be everyone's thinking. :)

I think most of that could be enforced by a linter rule..I modeled a lot of this design off of the C# docs.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/programming-guide/classes-and-structs/named-and-optional-arguments