Skip to content

Conversation

@taotieren
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @taotieren, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've updated the README.md file to include a new badge. This enhancement aims to provide quick access to the project's packaging status, making it easier for users and contributors to see its availability across different platforms.

Highlights

  • README Update: I've added a new "Packaging status" badge from Repology to the README.md file. This badge provides a quick visual indicator of the libosal project's packaging status across various repositories and links directly to its versions page on Repology.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a Repology packaging status badge to the README.md file. This is a helpful addition for users to see the packaging status. I have one suggestion to improve the formatting and consistency of the badge placement.

Comment on lines +12 to +13
[![Packaging status](https://repology.org/badge/vertical-allrepos/libosal.svg)](https://repology.org/project/libosal/versions)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For better readability and consistency, all badges should be grouped together. This new badge is separated from the others by a blank line, and this change also introduces an extra blank line before the ## Overview header.

Please move this badge to be with the others (e.g., after line 10) and ensure there is only one blank line between the block of badges and the header.

@robert-burger robert-burger merged commit 7b60b9c into robert-burger:master Aug 11, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants