apps/maze: fix possible stack overflow#2
Merged
ringtailsoftware merged 1 commit intoringtailsoftware:mainfrom Dec 14, 2025
Merged
apps/maze: fix possible stack overflow#2ringtailsoftware merged 1 commit intoringtailsoftware:mainfrom
ringtailsoftware merged 1 commit intoringtailsoftware:mainfrom
Conversation
The original code this app is inspired from uses rand(), which returns a number >= 0. mulberry32() on the other hand can return a negative number, in which case will overflow the accesses in the dirs array. Fix that by forcing the result to be unsigned.
Owner
|
Thank you! I got really confused by this and had assumed it was something weird about the optimiser. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I used your maze example to test my very own RISC-V emulator, which for some reason kept crashing when being compiled with anything greater than -O0, and I've spent 3 hours trying to figure out where the bug is — and it is in this code snippet! :)
The original code this app is inspired from, mentioned at the top of the file, uses rand(), which returns a number >= 0.
mulberry32() on the other hand can return a negative number, in which case will overflow the accesses in the dirs array. Apparently this wasn't reproducible unless optimizations were turned on.
I know it's such a small part of your project, but perhaps this'll save some headache to anyone using your examples to test their RISC-V emulators!