COO-1597: Raise memory limit of observability-operator deploy#994
COO-1597: Raise memory limit of observability-operator deploy#994muellerfabi wants to merge 1 commit intorhobs:mainfrom
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: muellerfabi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Hi @muellerfabi. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a rhobs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/retitle COO-1597: Raise memory limit of observability-operator deploy while it might help the reported case, I think that we should also document how users can customize the out-of-the box limits and where the current limits fit because I'm sure that we'll get other reports in the future (https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager/blob/master/doc/design/subscription-config.md#resources). |
|
@muellerfabi: This pull request references COO-1597 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
On a larger OCP 4.18 cluster with 66 nodes observability-operator 1.3.0 gets OOMKilled right after start.
Issue is reported in https://access.redhat.com/support/cases/#/case/04368491
Issue is tracked in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/COO-1597