chore: bump version to v26.3.3

[nsrCodes]

Releases:

• ENGG-5319 : Fix form-urlencoded body handling for GET requests #295
• Intercepteded close event for hidding bg console instead of killing it #301
• [RQ-654] : Fix: add Id to Errored Records #304

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Released version 26.3.3 with package updates.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c84c309 and 8726e4c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
• release/app/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• package.json
• release/app/package.json

---

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the version field in two package.json files from 26.2.27 to 26.3.3. The root package.json and release/app/package.json are both modified with the same version bump. No dependencies, logic, or other configuration changes are included.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• chore: bump version to v26.2.27 #303: Directly precedes this PR by bumping version to 26.2.27, which is then advanced to 26.3.3 in this change.
• chore: bump version to v26.2.20 #297: Updates the same version fields in both package.json files for a different target version.
• chore: bump version to v26.2.17 #294: Modifies both package.json and release/app/package.json version fields for a version bump.

Suggested reviewers

• RuntimeTerror10
• Aarushsr12

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: bumping the package version to v26.3.3, which matches the file changes in package.json and release/app/package.json.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch pre_v26.3.3

Tip

Try Coding Plans. Let us write the prompt for your AI agent so you can ship faster (with fewer bugs).
Share your feedback on Discord.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}